The night of February 8-9, 2016 will go down in the history of Moscow and in the history of Russian Facebook. Across the capital, several dozen shopping pavilions were demolished overnight - some of them (for example, near metro stations " Chistye Prudy", "Arbatskaya" or "Kropotkinskaya") stood there for years. in social networks and the expert community, disputes unfolded about how legitimate and justified the Moscow "Night of the Long Buckets" was.
The first associations were not very pleasant for the Moscow authorities.
Today in Moscow is "kristallnacht" for business.
"Night of the Long Buckets" is a genius joke.
Tonight, apparently the last 104 kiosks are being smashed and cut down all over Moscow. On the basis that "they pose a danger": "A danger to the supporting structures of the subway, a danger to evacuation in case of a terrorist threat" - and many other terrible dangers are listed to us, which suddenly began to come from kiosks that had been standing for decades - and nothing, the supporting structures of the subway somehow withstood them. Sergei Sobyanin's war on kiosks is clearly paranoid.
The word "war" for evaluating events sounds quite often in general.
In general, today is a historical night, of course. At the same time in dozens of places in Moscow, just some kind of barbarossa, wow.
The mayor of Moscow organized a night special operation throughout the city - to destroy property and jobs of citizens. There is something about films about the treacherous attack of Nazi Germany.
And you know what else is so annoying? This type of action - as if the city is being stormed. Woke up on a summer morning - wow! the entire center is dug up, the lanes are closed with concrete blocks. woke up winter morning- oops! there were tents, pavilions, etc. - and there are none, piles of garbage. These operations are of the military type, why is this?
War as a way of existence. First, citizens, taking advantage of the weakness of the state,<обманули>him by building these stalls. Gaining strength, the state<победило>citizens. With special cynicism, in the usual style of a special operation, at night, with a muzzle in the snow. That's how we live. Unhappy country.
The network is full of photos and videos from the scene. The associations are really quite creepy.
There is also a lot of evidence of a "special operation" - something like this.
I went to the "night of long buckets" in the Airport area, I was impressed.
Almost a military operation: cops in helmets and armor, flashing lights, special equipment, a roar and dozens of shops bursting under the weight of bulldozers. Here we bought cakes, here cutlets. Here you had to go with a piece of paper to the cashier and name the code for a light bulb, antifreeze or gloves with bubble wraps - wonderful, of course, but we don’t have another spare parts store here in the district.
Now, here, a mountain of flowers on frozen asphalt, confused saleswomen against the backdrop of seven cubic meters of construction debris. Someone is being pumped out in an ambulance. A friend is looking for a job for the first time in twenty years. The owner of the pavilion, trying to defend her right to pay taxes here, won two court cases, but “get behind the fence” - you can’t argue against physics, the police are stronger, you must obey their pokes.
Where there is war, there is the Supreme Commander. Some kiosks were demolished, despite the portraits of Putin pasted on their windows.
St. Vladimir Krymnashsky, patron saint of tenters
"Closer to the heart, we pricked the profiles so that He could hear how the hearts beat!"
It seems that the owners of buildings being demolished in Moscow are hanging portraits of Putin as icons. They hope that they will not dare to demolish the windows with the sacred face.
But seriously, behind each of these demolitions are simple human tragedies.
Just imagine. You have bought a property. Checked all documents. They paid the money, most likely - partially borrowed. Received a certificate.
And then an uncle from the city hall comes to you and says: and now we will demolish it. No compensation.
And if someone thinks that this cannot happen to his dacha, house, cottage, he is greatly mistaken.
In the glorious city of Saratov, not so long ago already inhabited townhouses were demolished. Families with children were evicted with riot police.
So, okay, are you for the demolition or against it? Comments are open
There were both supporters and opponents of the special operation.
I would like to understand why it had to be done this way. At the level of adoption and implementation of the resolution, I consider this happiness.
Against, although outwardly I did not like them. It is impossible to treat private business in this way, especially at the present time. Thousands of people will now be out of work, and we will go to Auchan for chocolate.
There are those for whom "not everything is so simple." Opinion of the author of the photo essay in Novaya Gazeta Evgeny Feldman:
I am in mixed feelings
on the one hand, it's all great, the city is getting cleaner, public spaces, benches, trees and the police are chasing excavators with the words "get off the road, get out, get on the bike path and shoot"
on the other hand, a lot. Here are the entrepreneurs, they did not pay any bribes, but paid rent. After all, they invested in all these stalls, in all these pharmacies and "Uncle Borya." and they are evicted without any compensation, also warning the devils how - in words they said "after the eighth we will demolish", in the end they started right on the eighth night. there are still courts going on, they write on the banners. as a result, they had to endure all their belongings right now, in the night - that's why?<...>
and fourthly, you understand, when you walk down the street in New York, then there are all the first floors - in shops, cafes, laundries. and the city is actively engaged in the regulation of rental prices, so that everywhere there are places necessary for life.<...>and we have a clean editorial office - and they demolished the most convenient pharmacy in the area, the only photo printing point, one of the two grocery stores ... the city must first provide normal prices and normal places for all these pharmacies, flower shops and other rock shops, and then demolish all these illegal stalls. and with respect to entrepreneurs, of course.
they are doing a good job, and such a disgrace in the process.
On the one hand, kiosks disfigure the city, on the other - "Atrium" on Kurskaya - the same kiosk, just big, on the third - it cannot be demolished like Mamai, without trial, on the fourth - and it was impossible to build illegally and in collusion with officials .
In general, I have complex feelings.
The main argument of demolition advocates is aesthetic. The stalls, they say, disfigured the city, and their demolition is intended to give it a "European" look.
THE END OF A HORRIBLE AGE
On the night of February 8-9, Moscow began demolishing the ugly squatter building that had been littering the capital for over 20 years.
Recall that the city authorities ordered the demolition of 104 unauthorized buildings erected in violation of the rules and building codes.
Finally!
The ugly 90s and Luzhkovism are gradually leaving Moscow. Fine!
Do you seriously consider city hall officials and security guards who have their own rather big gesheft on the stalls to be small businesses?
Thank God, is this plastic rubbish, which disfigured "Chistye Prudy" to smithereens, simply destroyed the square, will finally be demolished. Small business, of course, should be only in the first floors. Evenly throughout the city. And not at the points of transport hubs. Where there are not enough places. By the way, it is precisely these shopping malls for thousands square meters trade at the point of the transport hub - they burn out the rest of the small business in the area with napalm. However, of course, of course, no one will allow small business to develop humanly. Small businesses are already destroyed. But the construction of plastic crap in the historical center and the transformation of the squares in front of the metro lobbies into a filthy, spit-spitting bazaar with leaky toilets must be unambiguously destroyed. It is absolutely impossible to disfigure the architecture of your own city.
It's only morning, and some Muscovites are already crying that they can no longer buy in cardboard stalls near the metro:
grilled kuru, cheap headphones, shawarma, fleece tights, singed alcohol, inexpensive mobile phones (stolen or even worse), cat whites, imported boots, SIM cards without a passport, a fur coat, breath-freshening chewing gum, a winking icon, spices, camel hair socks, purple dildo, dog butt pie, orange nail polish.
I'm sorry, but I can only say one thing about this. FINALLY. Stop disfiguring my city with this Asianism.
The Moscow of my dreams is a city of gardens, antiques, and openwork glass buildings.
In short, war to stalls, peace to agricultural fairs, cozy cafes and online stores!
There is also an argument like this:
Colorado-entrepreneurs who were subjected yesterday to the obviously illegal demolition of your property, tents, kiosks, shops all over Moscow with iron, but polite, equipment.
Yesterday was your "Little Crimea", when the legalized property was suddenly seized by force by the decision of one of the parties.
Colorados of other categories, your "Little Crimea", if it has not yet begun, but not far off, because you, the Colorado brat, spit on someone else's property rights until it touches you yourself. Someone has now spat at you.
The main thesis of opponents is that the Moscow authorities and Mayor Sobyanin trampled on property rights and dealt a blow to small businesses.
Now read the endless posts of aesthetically motivated citizens about the fact that finally these ugly shops near the metro are being demolished, and now there will be "beauty" and "like in Europe."
People defend the bombing of Moscow by Sobyanin, "well, it was ugly."
Aesthetes, only aesthetes around. The rest of the Luzhkov-Sobyanin architecture does not touch them, but the shopping centers near the metro are infuriating.
Thousands of people are left without work and business in the midst of the crisis. Tenants who were not in business at all. They and the landlords were given 60 days to leave with their belongings. This is madness.
Regarding the demolition of tents next to the picturesque historical subway pavilions ... But then in European cities it is necessary to demolish all the houses around the cathedrals in the center. They also distort the original perspective. There is a cathedral, say, of the 14th century, all covered with squatter construction of the 15th-19th century. Disorder.
in 2016, to argue the decisions of the Moscow authorities with the category of beauty is at least strange. There is a crisis in the country, the belts have been tightened for a couple of years. Under such conditions, taking away from people their small source of income is unnecessary sabotage. A war against our own citizens, a war to make things a little worse for them. A logical continuation after the stampede of geese by tractors at the border.
The main thing is that they suffered ordinary people. People who are in a crisis were already on the verge of survival. Any struggle for little things in the economic situation in which we find ourselves is inappropriate. When you rejoice at how Sobyanin cleared something with an iron fist, think about a thousand little children of sellers who lost their jobs overnight, who simply have nothing to eat today. For me, when choosing between a stall and a hungry child, the choice is obvious - a hungry child.
The argument "today stalls - tomorrow people" is generally repeated by many.
It would also be nice to clear Moscow of little people. They also ruin the look. They already cleared it once, at the inauguration, but then they ran again.
From the most memorable - fierce, just fierce hatred of any kind of business among the policemen who commented on what was happening. Every chaser who destroys private property absolutely believes he is right. He does it with honor. With dignity.
I wonder if they are wondering how and who will pay their salaries from taxes when they take away the last source of income from the last businessman?
In general, they demolished the stall - they got into entrepreneurship and capitalism (and, ultimately, Russia). Many commentators think so.
Why are trade pavilions being demolished in Moscow?
Because that is the nature of domestic power. She absolutely, sincerely hates everything that is beyond her control. Small and medium business is exactly what Lenin called "the petty-bourgeois element, hourly generating capitalism."
This power is genetically communist. She hates capitalism. And the associated freedom.
Always write the obvious.
This, of course, is not about fast food and other junk. Not even about two or three thousand people left without work during the crisis, although they are terribly sorry. This is about the court, which does not exist, and about the right to property, which does not exist. Actually, when the ruble falls, the stock exchange, excellent students leave, C grade students send their children away - this is exactly what it is about. About the lack of property and court.
I am almost sure: the nightly pogrom of the last Moscow kiosks and shops is not a local fool of Sobyanin who hates Moscow, but part of a large all-Russian project to destroy ANY business independent of the authorities.
The goal is to achieve a causal relationship between loyalty and the ability to somehow make ends meet.
And generally speaking. At one time, collectivization was carried out not so that there would be more grain, meat and milk in the country, but in order to "destroy the kulaks as a class" - so that there would be no independent wealthy peasants who do not need handouts from the state and decide for themselves how to live. To have only disenfranchised half-starved collective farmers - such a revolt will not be raised.
Now the country is liquidating the middle class, if anyone does not understand.
The defenders of the “stalls” place the accents in different ways:
Liberals compose that the fierce hatred of Sobyaninism for small business is, in addition to a passion for "beauty", some kind of gesture of suppressing independents and dissenters, almost genetic communism. Oh no.
Hatred of small business is above all a property of big business.
Officials love big profits, monopolies, networks and corporations flourish around them. Everything should be large-scale and expensive, then they will put more in your pocket.
But in the main they more or less agree.
Gross violation of property rights, destruction of jobs in a crisis - "mayor" @MosSobyanin criminal and pest
Night of long stalls. The architectural appearance was spoiled - perhaps. Documents - did not check. But one thing is clear: that the symbol of relations between the city and small business in Moscow is an excavator. Who demolishes tents at night: with goods, with people inside.
During the crisis, Sobyanin deprived thousands of Muscovites of their jobs, the city of taxes, and took another step towards turning the city into a cemetery with trees in granite mourning tubs.
The coincidence of the arguments of some commentators even gave rise to ironic assessments.
There is also an assumption that Sobyanin is playing a "multi-move", and the Moscow authorities do not hate any business at all - on the contrary, they welcome some.
the final solution of the trade issue in Moscow. Go to the "Azbuka Vkusa" to eat black caviar
Today's "night of long buckets" is the most common redistribution of small retail trade in Moscow. And I am simply amazed at the naivety of some comrades who, while approving the demolition of shops and tents at night, write about the historical appearance or the need to combat unauthorized construction. These arguments have no meaning for the Sobyanin mayor's office. None. The only goal of the Sobyanints is to clean up the most tasty sites around the metro stations from the former owners, in order to subsequently divide them among "their own".
The city authorities launched a large-scale campaign to demolish the dangerous squatter. About 700 pieces of equipment were sent to fight against illegal trade pavilions in the amount of 97 objects. In total, all these self-construction facilities took away from the townspeople about 50 thousand square meters of public spaces - an area comparable to the area of seven football fields at once.
“These facilities are located on engineering communications, which means that they are potentially dangerous both in themselves and from the point of view of engineering networks operation. Firstly, none of the supervisory authorities knows how these facilities were built, to what extent the relevant norms and rules were taken into account. Secondly, for example, in case of any accident of a heating system or a gas pipeline, emergency services will not be able to promptly eliminate the consequences, simply because they are hindered by an unauthorized construction site, and in fact it is already a capital one, ”said the First Deputy Head of the State Inspectorate for Control over the Use of Facilities real estate in Moscow Timur Zeldich.
The Moscow authorities adopted a decision to demolish 104 illegal buildings at the end of last year, on December 8. The federal amendments to Article 222 of the Civil Code gave the green light to the fight against unauthorized construction. Officials promised to pay compensation to the owners of illegal buildings. True, only those who go to the demolition voluntarily and terminate the right of ownership. As Rosbalt was explained in the Department of Economic Policy of the Moscow Mayor's Office, the issue of compensation is within the competence of the prefectures, and in each case it is the prefectures that determine the amount of payments, guided by the resolution of the mayor's office.
The deadline for the owners of 97 illegal buildings to be dismantled by the city authorities expired on February 8. As Rosbalt was told in the press service of the State Inspectorate for Control over the Use of Real Estate, only one owner took advantage of this opportunity - the owner of a gas station in Zelenograd. As for the remaining 96, someone simply packed up, freeing the premises for demolition, while someone resisted the decision of the authorities to the last, preventing the operation of equipment.
They demolished illegal, according to the authorities, objects by the forces of the State Budgetary Institution " Car roads". Among others, retail facilities were dismantled near the Chistye Prudy, Taganskaya, Sokol, Partizanskaya, Shchelkovskaya, Arbatskaya, Ulitsa 1905 Goda and Marxistskaya metro stations. The list also includes the Pyramida shopping center next to the Pushkinskaya metro station, shopping pavilions at Dynamo, Kropotkinskaya and Mayakovskaya.
According to the profile state inspectorate, in total, all these unauthorized construction sites took away from the townspeople about 50 thousand square meters. m. of public spaces - an area comparable to the area of seven football fields at once.
“Unfortunately, in the 1990s, objects were built around metro stations that are located on engineering communications, in the technological zone of the metro, pose a danger to those who work in them and those who are served, and, of course, create a lot of inconvenience for those who use the subway and, when exiting, are faced not with a square that would be ventilated, but, in fact, with some kind of bazaar, arbitrarily erected, ”the mayor said today at a meeting in the mayor’s office.
Sobyanin instructed to restore order in the liberated territories as soon as possible, remove construction debris and temporarily improve the sites. It is planned to start permanent improvement only after the design work. According to the mayor, these will be “significant projects”, which he instructed to coordinate with Muscovites.
The mayor also instructed to establish contact with the owners of the demolished structures. “If they want to do business, if they have money to invest, it is necessary to provide them with such an opportunity on other land plots – in accordance with federal and city legislation,” the mayor said.
“Samostroy objects, especially those located in the historical center, disfigure the appearance of our city. Such buildings are a shameful legacy of the 90s, they were erected not only without taking into account the architectural features of the city, but also without taking into account even minimal aesthetic considerations. Their owners had only money in their heads,” said architectural historian Alexei Klimenko.
Despite the obvious arguments in favor of such a decision, a discussion broke out today on social networks around the demolition of shopping facilities. The fact is that in the appendix to that very decree, almost the entire "squatter" is listed with the indication of cadastral numbers. So, opponents of the demolition point out that it was erected with the permission of the former authorities.
“It is necessary to check the legitimacy of the decisions made for each object,” said Dmitry Sazonov, chairman of the commission of the Chamber of Commerce of the Russian Federation for the development of small and medium-sized businesses. - It's no secret that in Russia, especially in Moscow, there is enough self-building. If we are talking about retail facilities, this is always unfair competition, and we need to put things in order. But this must be done exclusively in the legal field.
The actions of the city authorities aroused interest in the deputies. According to Valery Rashkin, State Duma deputy from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, today he sent a request Attorney General with a request to verify the legality of the demolition decisions. According to him, some of the owners have documents on the ownership of these objects. “Since there are documents, it means that it was necessary to either conclude agreements with them on the provision of other sites, or through the court to deprive them of their property rights, if we are talking about violations on their part. But this still needs to be proven, ”Rashkin explained his act.
Anna Semenets
I want to clarify my position on the stalls and everything connected with it, otherwise many people ask, but the topic is confusing, and I spoke in different places.
Generally
1. I consider one of the important tasks of the mayor's office to find legal ways to rid the city of buildings that did not understand how they appeared in the 90s and 2000s. My ideal mayor would deal with this issue closely and personally supervise the process of deliverance, either by delegating supervision to the deputy,
Because the appearance of the city is important, and a society that treats its historical cultural sites, this is some kind of wrong society.
2. I think that small retail trade, cafes, stalls for selling anything, including those near metro stations, is good and right, if it does not spoil the look of the city.
In St. Petersburg, right inside the metro, newspapers are sold and nothing. In many cities around the world, exits from metro stations are small shopping centers, and everything is in order. Trade on the streets is a natural part of city life, it is necessary to get rid not of trade, but of ugly buildings
3. I consider private property sacred. I think that if a person legally owns a building, then it cannot be demolished without an agreement with him about compensation, even if it is ugly. And yes, sometimes it comes to this (this is in China). The man refused to sell the house, and the highway was built around
4. When solving such issues, you need to act carefully, because behind them there is a huge tail of problems associated with it is not clear how someone's property has arisen. From huge malls to cottages on the coasts - if we now return to the discussion of how this was all resolved, then half of Moscow will have to be demolished.
According to the events of the night of long ladles
1. Sobyanin repeatedly applied to the courts to recognize these buildings as unauthorized and regularly lost them - the buildings were built in full in accordance with the law, all permits were obtained. It is obvious that by corruption and bypassing the norms, but received.
But in the summer, the concept of “unauthorized construction” was introduced into the Civil Code. There is a procedure for recognizing long-standing buildings as unauthorized structures. I will not retell, it is better to see the article for yourself.
2. Sobyanin took advantage of the emerging legal loophole and demolished the buildings, but he didn’t give a damn about the fact that this is private property, which has documents. The legal part of the process was well described on RAPSI.
3. These buildings, of course, are not unauthorized at all - try to build something unauthorized on Pushkinskaya near the metro, connect it to electricity and sewerage. Officials coordinated them, then they were sold, bought, rented out, many years passed and suddenly they became unauthorized. Navalny wrote about this perfectly.
4. I think that the mayor's office has unraveled a very complex ball with completely clumsy actions. In my opinion, it was worth negotiating with the owners. To redeem these objects, to compensate for their losses.
It's okay to spend taxpayer money buying ugly buildings for demolition if you own them. It's much better than tearing them down in the middle of the night and starting a discussion about the legality of all buildings in the city since 1991.
Atrium and European legal? Is the Scarlet Sails residential complex legal? Point buildings?
Here, according to the norms, it was allowed to build 5 floors, but they built 25. Will Sobyanin arrive tomorrow on a bulldozer to demolish residential buildings as unauthorized buildings, which in Luzhkov's time were not poked anywhere?
According to the media coverage of what is happening
Everyone ran into a hot topic and began to throw in anything. Starting from the fact that people suffered during the demolition, ending with the fact that the Russian Orthodox Church is going to build churches on the site of the demolished stalls
Most of all, I was pissed off by the reaction of FBK and Navalny to this - for some reason they decided to tie Vice Mayor for Transport Maxim Liksutov into the situation, who, well, in general, has nothing to do with it from any side.
Moreover, they did this on the basis of an anonymous letter, which states that a transport hub with other stalls will be built on the site of the demolished stalls. I wrote about this.
The reaction to the stuffing was even more upsetting: people began to demand evidence that this was not so, instead of explaining to our political activists that such accusations were not thrown on the basis of anonymous letters and that Deptrans was not in charge of the construction of the TPU, Khusnullin did it
1. In my opinion, it is necessary to cover such events more calmly, do not throw any nonsense into a heated audience, and if they accidentally throw it in, then refute it in time,
2. Politicians who are trying to reinforce their old campaigns with stuffing or get a political point should, in my opinion, be reassured, and not at all supported by the spread of stuffing.
Total
I consider these actions completely barbaric, it is impossible to solve problems this way and the mayor's office is wrong. They solve the right problem, but instead of adequately solving it with the search for compromises, they took it and slashed it off the shoulder. A good mayor is needed in order to resolve such problems taking into account the interests of the parties involved, and not to deprive people of their property under the guise of a piece of paper.
I hope the owners of the demolished buildings will sue themselves for large compensation.
Sorry for the press release format, but I had to spend the whole day yesterday explaining my position on various social networks, and now I decided to collect everything in one place.
On Tuesday night, in different parts of Moscow, the demolition of trade kiosks, tents and pavilions, recognized by the capital's government as a potentially dangerous squatter, began. The list for demolition included 104 objects, including the Piramida shopping center on Tverskaya and retail outlets near central stations metro. Earlier, the owners of the pavilions appealed to Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika and Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin with a request to prevent their demolition, Kommersant reports. And here is how Facebook users living in Moscow reacted to the demolition of the stalls.
Denis Dragunsky, writer : "About NITs. It's not that they demolish stalls and pavilions. That is, of course, this is not good and unpleasant, but, I repeat, that's not the point. This, as they say in the old children's joke, "a disaster, but not a problem." And the trouble is that at the same time the nitty squeak of a peaceful layman is heard: "But if you look objectively, stalls and pavilions spoil the view!" and even: "So what, that the legality of the construction was confirmed by the court - or maybe it was the wrong court?" No food, nit, don't try! You will be the first to be combed out of the curls of the nation, clicked on the nail and rubbed with your foot on the asphalt. That is, about paving slabs.
Dina Magomedova, philologist : "Night of the long buckets! Mayoral mobster - local know-how."
You can’t return a rolled up one, and perhaps you don’t need it - the glorious world of flowers and underpants is already in the past. only one thing warms my heart - do you see a white two-story building with round windows in the first photo? cottage cheese lives in it! The only edible cottage cheese within a radius of a couple of kilometers. of course, the cottage cheese fortress - and it even matches its purpose in color - is also being demolished: its image flashed among the pictures of the squatter building doomed to destruction, which I saw a couple of weeks ago on some site. But here's the bad luck - it really is a real fortress: powerful, concrete, stable! I think that a municipal excavator will break a couple of buckets on it; something more is clearly needed here. And that means that the curd will still fight."
Pavel Pryanikov, journalist : Sobyanin: Demolish everything, the Lord in heaven will figure out whether the buildings are legal or not!
Elena Panfilova, expert in the field of combating corruption in Russia : “About why you can’t rejoice at the demolition of kiosks. Because, while in the country at the intellectual and legal levels there is completely no understanding of what “inviolability of private property” is, today kiosks were demolished, and tomorrow your apartment will be demolished. seem ugly and out of place. All other arguments (taxes, small businesses, jobs) are secondary."
Dmitry Gudkov, State Duma deputy : "And once again about the night battle in Moscow. I looked at the documents (below - just one of them). It is important to understand that the headlines of the semi-official media are lying. The pavilions were not self-built - they had the necessary permits. How received, when - this is a question already to officials, to which they are in no hurry to answer, but there were documents. On what basis were the pavilions demolished? - And here's the trick. Only recently, Moscow passed a law according to which such buildings can be considered dangerous if gas is laid under them and nearby ", water and other networks. And, of course, she laid these networks urgently. Sleight of hand and no fraud. What is happening now? The Duma announced its readiness to adopt a law on compensation to businesses for the demolition of pavilions. But the law retroactive does not have. What prevented the adoption of the law earlier (it is obviously necessary)? The second question, already to the Moscow authorities: why do you change the rules of the game in the course of the game? In a crisis, the main priority should be business and its development. Instead, first you let it grow and then you destroy it. Once again. And one more thing - until, finally, there is no one left in the city who would believe the new assurances and try to open their own business. And it's taxes. These are jobs. This is what the city is all about. Pavilions could be ugly, they could get in the way - but where is the alternative? Why is it only now, after a wave of indignation, that Sobyanin’s VKontakte (is it now an official portal?) A vague promise “if you want to provide the opportunity to build retail facilities in other places and already legally” appears. First, a blow with a chessboard on the head, and then - "let's continue the game." And a board move on the head - these are our rules, yes, if you don’t like it, don’t play.
