The properties of water never cease to amaze scientists. Water is a fairly simple substance with chemical point vision, however, it has a number of unusual properties that never cease to amaze scientists. Below are some facts that few people know about.

1. Which water freezes faster - cold or hot?

Take two containers of water: pour hot water into one and cold water into the other, and place them in the freezer. Hot water will freeze faster than cold water, although logically, cold water should have turned into ice first: after all, hot water must first cool down to cold temperature, and then turn into ice, while cold water does not need to cool down. Why is this happening?

In 1963, a Tanzanian student named Erasto B. Mpemba, while freezing a prepared ice cream mixture, noticed that the hot mixture solidified faster in the freezer than the cold one. When the young man shared his discovery with a physics teacher, he only laughed at him. Fortunately, the student was persistent and convinced the teacher to conduct an experiment, which confirmed his discovery: under certain conditions, hot water really freezes faster than cold water.

Now this phenomenon of hot water freezing faster than cold water is called the Mpemba effect. True, long before him, this unique property of water was noted by Aristotle, Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes.

Scientists do not fully understand the nature of this phenomenon, explaining it either by the difference in hypothermia, evaporation, ice formation, convection, or the effect of liquefied gases on hot and cold water.

2. She is able to freeze instantly

Everyone knows that water always turns to ice when it cools down to 0°C...except in some cases! Such a case is, for example, supercooling, which is the property of very pure water to remain liquid even when cooled to a temperature below freezing. This phenomenon becomes possible due to the fact that the environment does not contain crystallization centers or nuclei that could provoke the formation of ice crystals. And so water remains in liquid form, even when cooled to temperatures below zero degrees Celsius.

The crystallization process can be triggered, for example, by gas bubbles, impurities (pollution), uneven surface of the container. Without them, water will remain in a liquid state. When the crystallization process starts, you can watch how the super-cooled water instantly turns into ice.

Note that "superheated" water also remains liquid even when heated above its boiling point.

3. 19 states of water

Without hesitation, name how many different states water has? If you answered three: solid, liquid, gaseous, then you are mistaken. Scientists distinguish at least 5 different states of water in liquid form and 14 states in frozen form.

Remember the conversation about super-chilled water? So, no matter what you do, at -38 ° C, even the purest super-cooled water will suddenly turn into ice. What happens as the temperature drops further? At -120°C, something strange begins to happen to water: it becomes super-viscous or viscous, like molasses, and at temperatures below -135°C, it turns into "glassy" or "glassy" water - a solid that lacks crystalline structure.

4. Water surprises physicists

On molecular level water surprises even more. In 1995, a neutron scattering experiment conducted by scientists gave an unexpected result: physicists found that neutrons directed at water molecules “see” 25% fewer hydrogen protons than expected.

It turned out that at the speed of one attosecond (10 -18 seconds) an unusual quantum effect, and the chemical formula of water instead of H2O becomes H1.5O!

5. Water memory

Homeopathy, an alternative to official medicine, claims that a dilute solution medicinal product can have a therapeutic effect on the body, even if the dilution factor is so large that there is nothing left in the solution but water molecules. Proponents of homeopathy explain this paradox by a concept called "memory of water", according to which water at the molecular level has a "memory" of the substance once dissolved in it and retains the properties of the solution of the original concentration after not a single molecule of the ingredient remains in it.

An international team of scientists led by Professor Madeleine Ennis of Queen's University of Belfast, who criticized the principles of homeopathy, conducted an experiment in 2002 to disprove the concept once and for all. The result was the opposite. After that, the scientists said that they were able to prove the reality of the "memory of water" effect. However, experiments conducted under the supervision of independent experts did not bring results. Disputes about the existence of the phenomenon of "memory of water" continue.

Water has many other unusual properties that we have not covered in this article. For example, the density of water changes with temperature (the density of ice is less than the density of water)

water has a fairly high surface tension

in a liquid state, water is a complex and dynamically changing network of water clusters, and it is the behavior of clusters that affects the structure of water, etc.

You can read about these and many other unexpected features of water in the article "The Anomalous Properties of Water" by Martin Chaplin, a professor at the University of London.

In 1963, a schoolboy from Tanzania named Erasto Mpemba asked his teacher a stupid question - why did warm ice cream freeze faster than cold ice cream in his freezer?

As a student of the Magamba high school in Tanzania, Erasto Mpemba did practical work in the culinary arts. He had to make homemade ice cream - boil milk, dissolve sugar in it, cool it to room temperature, and then put it in the refrigerator to freeze. Apparently, Mpemba was not a particularly diligent student and procrastinated on the first part of the assignment. Fearing that he would not be in time by the end of the lesson, he put still hot milk in the refrigerator. To his surprise, it froze even earlier than the milk of his comrades, prepared according to a given technology.

He turned to the physics teacher for clarification, but he only laughed at the student, saying the following: "This is not world physics, but the physics of Mpemba." After that, Mpemba experimented not only with milk, but also with plain water.

In any case, already being a student at the Mkvava High School, he asked Professor Dennis Osborne from the University College in Dar es Salaam (invited by the director of the school to give a lecture on physics to the students) about water: “If you take two identical containers with equal volumes of water so that in one of them the water has a temperature of 35 ° C, and in the other - 100 ° C, and put them in the freezer, then in the second the water will freeze faster. Why?" Osborn became interested in this issue and soon in 1969, together with Mpemba, they published the results of their experiments in the journal Physics Education. Since then, the effect they discovered is called the Mpemba effect.

Are you curious to know why this happens? Just a few years ago, scientists managed to explain this phenomenon ...

The Mpemba effect (Mpemba Paradox) is a paradox that states that hot water under certain conditions freezes faster than cold water, although it must pass the temperature of cold water in the process of freezing. This paradox is an experimental fact that contradicts the usual ideas, according to which, under the same conditions, a hotter body needs more time to cool down to a certain temperature than a cooler body to cool down to the same temperature.

This phenomenon was noticed at the time by Aristotle, Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes. Until now, no one knows exactly how to explain this strange effect. Scientists do not have a single version, although there are many. It's all about the difference in the properties of hot and cold water, but it is not yet clear which properties play a role in this case: the difference in supercooling, evaporation, ice formation, convection, or the effect of liquefied gases on water at different temperatures. The paradox of the Mpemba effect is that the time during which the body cools down to the ambient temperature must be proportional to the temperature difference between this body and the environment. This law was established by Newton and since then has been confirmed many times in practice. In the same effect, water at 100°C cools down to 0°C faster than the same amount of water at 35°C.

Since then, different versions have been expressed, one of which was as follows: part of the hot water simply evaporates at first, and then, when a smaller amount remains, the water solidifies faster. This version, due to its simplicity, became the most popular, but scientists were not completely satisfied.

Now a team of researchers from University of Technology Nanyang in Singapore (Nanyang Technological University), led by chemist Xi Zhang, said they have solved the age-old mystery of why warm water freezes faster than cold water. As Chinese experts found out, the secret lies in the amount of energy stored in hydrogen bonds between water molecules.

As you know, water molecules are made up of one oxygen atom and two hydrogen atoms held together. covalent bonds, which at the particle level looks like an exchange of electrons. Another well-known fact is that hydrogen atoms are attracted to oxygen atoms from neighboring molecules - in this case, hydrogen bonds are formed.

At the same time, water molecules as a whole repel each other. Scientists from Singapore noticed that the warmer the water, the greater the distance between the molecules of the liquid due to the increase in repulsive forces. As a result, hydrogen bonds are stretched, and therefore store more energy. This energy is released when the water cools - the molecules approach each other. And the return of energy, as you know, means cooling.

Here are the hypotheses put forward by scientists:

Evaporation

Hot water evaporates faster from the container, thereby reducing its volume, and a smaller volume of water with the same temperature freezes faster. Water heated to 100°C loses 16% of its mass when cooled to 0°C. The evaporation effect is a double effect. First, the mass of water required for cooling is reduced. And secondly, due to evaporation, its temperature decreases.

temperature difference

Because the temperature difference between hot water and cold air more - therefore, heat transfer in this case is more intense and hot water cools faster.

hypothermia
When water is cooled below 0°C, it does not always freeze. Under certain conditions, it can undergo supercooling while continuing to remain liquid at temperatures below the freezing point. In some cases, water can remain liquid even at -20°C. The reason for this effect is that in order for the first ice crystals to begin to form, centers of crystal formation are needed. If they are not in liquid water, then supercooling will continue until the temperature drops enough that crystals begin to form spontaneously. When they start to form in the supercooled liquid, they will start to grow faster, forming an ice slush that will freeze to form ice. Hot water is most susceptible to hypothermia because heating it eliminates dissolved gases and bubbles, which in turn can serve as centers for the formation of ice crystals. Why does hypothermia cause hot water to freeze faster? In the case of cold water that is not supercooled, what happens is that a thin layer of ice forms on its surface, which acts as an insulator between the water and the cold air, and thus prevents further evaporation. The rate of formation of ice crystals in this case will be less. In the case of hot water undergoing subcooling, the subcooled water does not have a protective surface layer of ice. Therefore, it loses heat much faster through the open top. When the supercooling process ends and the water freezes, much more heat is lost and therefore more ice. Many researchers of this effect consider hypothermia to be the main factor in the case of the Mpemba effect.
Convection

Cold water begins to freeze from above, thereby worsening the processes of heat radiation and convection, and hence the loss of heat, while hot water begins to freeze from below. This effect is explained by an anomaly in the density of water. Water has a maximum density at 4°C. If you cool water to 4°C and place it in an environment with a lower temperature, the surface layer of water will freeze faster. Because this water is less dense than water at 4°C, it will stay on the surface, forming a thin cold layer. Under these conditions, a thin layer of ice will form on the surface of the water for a short time, but this layer of ice will serve as an insulator protecting the lower layers of water, which will remain at 4°C. Therefore, the further cooling process will be slower. In the case of hot water, the situation is completely different. The surface layer of water will cool more rapidly due to evaporation and greater temperature differences. Also, cold water layers are denser than hot water layers, so the cold water layer will sink down, lifting the warm water layer to the surface. This circulation of water ensures a rapid drop in temperature. But why does this process not reach the equilibrium point? To explain the Mpemba effect from the point of view of convection, it would be assumed that the cold and hot layers of water are separated and the convection process itself continues after the average water temperature drops below 4°C. However, there is no experimental evidence to support this hypothesis that cold and hot water layers are separated by convection.

gases dissolved in water

Water always contains gases dissolved in it - oxygen and carbon dioxide. These gases have the ability to lower the freezing point of water. When the water is heated, these gases are released from the water because their solubility in water at high temperature is lower. Therefore, when hot water is cooled, there are always fewer dissolved gases in it than in unheated cold water. Therefore, the freezing point of heated water is higher and it freezes faster. This factor is sometimes considered as the main one in explaining the Mpemba effect, although there are no experimental data confirming this fact.

Thermal conductivity

This mechanism can play a significant role when water is placed in a refrigerator freezer in small containers. Under these conditions, it has been observed that the container with hot water melts the ice of the freezer underneath, thereby improving thermal contact with the wall of the freezer and thermal conductivity. As a result, heat is removed from the hot water container faster than from the cold one. In turn, the container with cold water does not melt snow under it. All these (as well as other) conditions have been studied in many experiments, but an unambiguous answer to the question - which of them provide a 100% reproduction of the Mpemba effect - has not been obtained. So, for example, in 1995, the German physicist David Auerbach studied the influence of supercooling of water on this effect. He discovered that hot water, reaching a supercooled state, freezes at a higher temperature than cold water, and therefore faster than the latter. But cold water reaches a supercooled state faster than hot water, thereby compensating for the previous lag. In addition, Auerbach's results contradicted earlier data that hot water is able to achieve greater supercooling due to fewer crystallization centers. When water is heated, gases dissolved in it are removed from it, and when it is boiled, some salts dissolved in it precipitate. So far, only one thing can be asserted - the reproduction of this effect significantly depends on the conditions under which the experiment is carried out. Precisely because it is not always reproduced.

And here's the most likely reason.

As the chemists write in their article, which can be found on the arXiv.org preprint site, hydrogen bonds are stretched more strongly in hot water than in cold water. Thus, it turns out that more energy is stored in the hydrogen bonds of hot water, which means that more of it is released when cooled to sub-zero temperatures. For this reason, freezing is faster.

To date, scientists have solved this riddle only theoretically. When they present convincing evidence of their version, then the question of why hot water freezes faster than cold water can be considered closed.

In this article, we will look at why hot water freezes faster than cold water.

Heated water freezes much faster than cold water! This amazing property of water, the exact explanation for which scientists still cannot find, has been known since ancient times. For example, even in Aristotle there is a description of winter fishing: fishermen inserted fishing rods into holes in the ice, and so that they would freeze faster, watered the ice. warm water. The name of this phenomenon was named after Erasto Mpemba in the 60s of the XX century. Mnemba noticed the strange effect while making ice cream and turned to his physics teacher, Dr. Denis Osborne, for an explanation. Mpemba and Dr. Osborne experimented with water at different temperatures and concluded that almost boiling water begins to freeze much faster than water at room temperature. Other scientists have carried out their own experiments and each time they have obtained similar results.

Explanation of a physical phenomenon

There is no generally accepted explanation as to why this is happening. Many researchers suggest that it's all about the supercooling of a liquid, which occurs when its temperature drops below freezing. In other words, if water freezes at a temperature below 0°C, then supercooled water can have a temperature of, for example, -2°C and still remain liquid without turning into ice. When we try to freeze cold water, there is a chance that it will become supercooled at first, and will only harden after some time. In heated water, other processes take place. Its faster transformation into ice is associated with convection.

Convection- This physical phenomenon, at which the warm lower layers of the liquid rise, and the upper, cooled ones, fall.

This is true, although it sounds incredible, because in the process of freezing, preheated water must pass the temperature of cold water. Meanwhile, this effect is widely used. For example, ice rinks and slides are filled with hot water instead of cold water in winter. Experts advise motorists to pour cold rather than hot water into the washer reservoir in winter. The paradox is known worldwide as the "Mpemba Effect".

This phenomenon was mentioned at one time by Aristotle, Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes, but only in 1963 did physics professors pay attention to it and try to investigate it. It all started when Tanzanian schoolboy Erasto Mpemba noticed that the sweetened milk he used to make ice cream solidified faster if it was preheated and suggested that hot water freezes faster than cold water. He turned to the physics teacher for clarification, but he only laughed at the student, saying the following: "This is not world physics, but the physics of Mpemba."

Fortunately, Dennis Osborn, a professor of physics from the University of Dar es Salaam, visited the school one day. And Mpemba turned to him with the same question. The professor was less skeptical, said that he could not judge what he had never seen, and upon returning home asked the staff to conduct appropriate experiments. It looks like they confirmed the boy's words. In any case, in 1969, Osborne spoke about working with Mpemba in the magazine "Eng. PhysicsEducation". In the same year, George Kell of the Canadian National Research Council published an article describing the phenomenon in English. AmericanJournalofPhysics».

There are several possible explanations for this paradox:

• Hot water evaporates faster, thereby reducing its volume, and a smaller volume of water with the same temperature freezes faster. In airtight containers, cold water should freeze faster.
• The presence of snow lining. The hot water container melts the snow underneath, thereby improving thermal contact with the cooling surface. Cold water does not melt snow under it. With no snow lining, the cold water container should freeze faster.
• Cold water begins to freeze from above, thereby worsening the processes of heat radiation and convection, and hence the loss of heat, while hot water begins to freeze from below. With additional mechanical agitation of the water in the containers, the cold water should freeze faster.
• The presence of crystallization centers in the cooled water - substances dissolved in it. With a small number of such centers in cold water, the transformation of water into ice is difficult, and even its supercooling is possible when it remains in a liquid state, having a sub-zero temperature.

Another explanation has recently been published. Dr. Jonathan Katz of the University of Washington investigated this phenomenon and concluded that substances dissolved in water play an important role in it, which precipitate when heated.
Under dissolved substances dr Katz refers to the calcium and magnesium bicarbonates found in hard water. When the water is heated, these substances precipitate, the water becomes "soft". Water that has never been heated contains these impurities and is "hard". As it freezes and ice crystals form, the concentration of impurities in water increases 50 times. This lowers the freezing point of water.

This explanation does not seem convincing to me, because. we must not forget that the effect was found in experiments with ice cream, and not with hard water. Most likely, the causes of the phenomenon are thermophysical, and not chemical.

So far, no unambiguous explanation of the Mpemba paradox has been received. I must say that some scientists do not consider this paradox worthy of attention. However, it is very interesting that a simple schoolboy has achieved recognition of the physical effect and gained popularity because of his curiosity and perseverance.

Added February 2014

The note was written in 2011. Since then, new studies of the Mpemba effect and new attempts to explain it have appeared. Thus, in 2012, the Royal Society of Chemistry of Great Britain announced international competition to solve the scientific mystery of the "Mpemba Effect" with a prize fund of 1000 pounds. The deadline was set on July 30, 2012. The winner was Nikola Bregovik from the laboratory of the University of Zagreb. He published his work, in which he analyzed previous attempts to explain this phenomenon and came to the conclusion that they were not convincing. The model he proposed is based on the fundamental properties of water. Those interested can find a job at http://www.rsc.org/mpemba-competition/mpemba-winner.asp

The research didn't end there. In 2013, physicists from Singapore theoretically proved the cause of the Mepemba effect. The work can be found at http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6514.

Related articles on the site:

Other articles of the section

Comments:

Alexey Mishnev. , 06.10.2012 04:14

Why does hot water evaporate faster? Scientists have practically proven that a glass of hot water freezes faster than cold water. Scientists cannot explain this phenomenon for the reason that they do not understand the essence of phenomena: heat and cold! Heat and cold are physical sensations caused by the interaction of particles of Matter, in the form of a counter compression of magnetic waves that move from the side of space and from the center of the earth. Therefore, the greater the potential difference of this magnetic voltage, the faster the energy exchange is carried out by the method of counter-penetration of one wave into another. That is, by diffusion! In response to my article, one opponent writes: 1) “..Hot water evaporates FASTER, as a result of which there is less of it, so it freezes faster” Question! What energy makes water evaporate faster? 2) In my article, we are talking about a glass, and not about a wooden trough, which the opponent cites as a counterargument. What is not correct! I answer the question: “FOR WHAT REASON DOES WATER EVAPORATION IN NATURE?” Magnetic waves, which always move from the center of the earth into space, overcoming the counter pressure of magnetic compression waves (which always move from space to the center of the earth), at the same time, spray water particles, since moving into space, they increase in volume. That is, expand! In case of overcoming the magnetic waves of compression, these water vapors are compressed (condensed) and under the influence of these magnetic compression forces, the water returns to the ground in the form of precipitation! Sincerely! Alexey Mishnev. October 6, 2012.

Alexey Mishnev. , 06.10.2012 04:19

What is temperature. Temperature is the degree of electromagnetic stress of magnetic waves with the energy of compression and expansion. In the case of an equilibrium state of these energies, the temperature of the body or substance is in a stable state. If the equilibrium state of these energies is disturbed, towards the energy of expansion, the body or substance increases in the volume of space. In case of exceeding the energy of magnetic waves in the direction of compression, the body or substance decreases in the volume of space. The degree of electromagnetic stress is determined by the degree of expansion or contraction of the reference body. Alexey Mishnev.

Moiseeva Natalia, 23.10.2012 11:36 | VNIIM

Alexey, you are talking about some article that outlines your thoughts on the concept of temperature. But no one read it. Please give me a link. In general, your views on physics are very peculiar. I have never heard of "electromagnetic expansion of the reference body".

Yuri Kuznetsov , 04.12.2012 12:32

A hypothesis is proposed that this is the work of intermolecular resonance and the ponderomotive attraction between molecules generated by it. In cold water, molecules move and vibrate randomly, with different frequencies. When water is heated, with an increase in the oscillation frequency, their range narrows (the frequency difference from liquid hot water to the point of vaporization decreases), the oscillation frequencies of the molecules approach each other, as a result of which a resonance occurs between the molecules. When cooled, this resonance is partially preserved, it does not die out immediately. Try pressing one of the two guitar strings that are in resonance. Now let go - the string will begin to vibrate again, the resonance will restore its vibrations. So in frozen water, the outer cooled molecules try to lose the amplitude and frequency of oscillations, but the “warm” molecules inside the vessel “pull” the oscillations back, act as vibrators, and the outer ones act as resonators. It is between the vibrators and the resonators that the ponderomotive attraction* arises. When the ponderomotive force becomes greater than the force caused by the kinetic energy of the molecules (which not only vibrate, but also move linearly), accelerated crystallization occurs - the "Mpemba Effect". The ponderomotive connection is very unstable, the Mpemba effect strongly depends on all accompanying factors: the volume of water to be frozen, the nature of its heating, freezing conditions, temperature, convection, heat exchange conditions, gas saturation, vibration of the refrigeration unit, ventilation, impurities, evaporation, etc. Perhaps even from lighting... Therefore, the effect has a lot of explanations and is sometimes difficult to reproduce. For the same “resonance” reason, boiled water boils faster than unboiled water - resonance for some time after boiling preserves the intensity of vibrations of water molecules (energy loss during cooling is mainly due to the loss of kinetic energy of the linear motion of molecules). With intense heating, vibrator molecules change roles with resonator molecules in comparison with freezing - the frequency of the vibrators is less than the frequency of the resonators, which means that there is not an attraction between the molecules, but a repulsion, which accelerates the transition to another state of aggregation(pair).

Vlad, 11.12.2012 03:42

Broke my brain...

Anton , 04.02.2013 02:02

1. Is this ponderomotive attraction really so great that it affects the heat transfer process? 2. Does this mean that when all bodies are heated to a certain temperature, their structural particles enter into resonance? 3. Why does this resonance disappear upon cooling? 4. Is this your guess? If there is a source, please indicate. 5. According to this theory, the shape of the vessel will play an important role, and if it is thin and flat, then the difference in freezing time will not be large, i.e. you can check it.

Gudrat , 11.03.2013 10:12 | METAK

Cold water already has nitrogen atoms and the distances between water molecules are closer than in hot water. That is, the conclusion: Hot water absorbs nitrogen atoms faster and at the same time it quickly freezes than cold water - this is comparable to the hardening of iron, since hot water turns into ice and hot iron hardens upon rapid cooling!

Vladimir , 03/13/2013 06:50

or maybe this: the density of hot water and ice is less than the density of cold water, and therefore water does not need to change its density, losing some time on this and it freezes.

Alexey Mishnev , 03/21/2013 11:50 am

Before talking about resonances, attraction and vibrations of particles, it is necessary to understand and answer the question: What forces make particles vibrate? Since, without kinetic energy, cannot be compressed. Without compression, there can be no expansion. Without expansion, there can be no kinetic energy! When you start talking about the resonance of strings, you first made an effort to make one of these strings start to vibrate! When talking about attraction, you must first of all indicate the force that makes these bodies attract! I affirm that all bodies are compressed by the electromagnetic energy of the atmosphere and which compresses all bodies, substances and elementary particles with a force of 1.33 kg. not per cm2, but per elementary particle. Since the pressure of the atmosphere cannot be selective! Do not confuse it with the amount of force!

Dodik , 05/31/2013 02:59

It seems to me that you have forgotten one truth - "Science begins where measurements begin." What is the temperature of the "hot" water? What is the temperature of "cold" water? The article doesn't say a word about it. From this we can conclude - the whole article is bullshit!

Grigory, 06/04/2013 12:17

Dodik, before calling an article nonsense, one must think to learn, at least a little. And not just measure.

Dmitry , 12/24/2013 10:57 AM

Hot water molecules move faster than in cold water, because of this there is a closer contact with environment, they seem to absorb all the cold quickly slowing down.

Ivan, 10.01.2014 05:53

It is surprising that such an anonymous article appeared on this site. The article is completely unscientific. Both the author and commentators vied with each other in search of an explanation of the phenomenon, not bothering to find out whether the phenomenon is observed at all, and if it is observed, then under what conditions. Moreover, there is not even an agreement on what we actually observe! So the author insists on the need to explain the effect of rapid freezing of hot ice cream, although from the entire text (and the words "the effect was found in experiments with ice cream") it follows that he himself did not set up such experiments. From the variants of "explanation" of the phenomenon listed in the article, it can be seen that completely different experiments are described, set up in different conditions with different aqueous solutions. Both the essence of the explanations and the subjunctive mood in them suggest that even an elementary verification of the ideas expressed was not carried out. Someone accidentally heard a curious story and casually expressed his speculative conclusion. I'm sorry but it's not physical Scientific research, and conversation in a smoking-room.

Ivan , 01/10/2014 06:10

Regarding the comments in the article about filling the rollers with hot water and cold washer reservoirs. Everything is simple from the point of view of elementary physics. The skating rink is filled with hot water just because it freezes more slowly. The rink must be level and smooth. Try to fill it with cold water - you will get bumps and "influxes", because. water will _quickly_ freeze without having time to spread in a uniform layer. And the hot one will have time to spread in an even layer, and it will melt the existing ice and snow bumps. With a washer, it’s also not difficult: there is no point in pouring clean water in frost - it freezes on glass (even hot); and hot non-freezing liquid can lead to cracking of cold glass, plus it will have an increased freezing point on the glass due to the accelerated evaporation of alcohols on the way to the glass (is everyone familiar with the principle of operation of the moonshine still? - alcohol evaporates, water remains).

Ivan , 01/10/2014 06:34

But in fact the phenomenon, it is silly to ask why two different experiments in different conditions proceed differently. If the experiment is set up cleanly, then you need to take hot and cold water of the same chemical composition- take pre-chilled boiling water from the same kettle. Pour into identical vessels (for example, thin-walled glasses). We put not on the snow, but on the same even, dry base, for example, a wooden table. And not in a microfreezer, but in a sufficiently voluminous thermostat - I conducted an experiment a couple of years ago in the country, when there was stable frosty weather outside, about -25C. Water crystallizes at a certain temperature after the release of the heat of crystallization. The hypothesis boils down to the assertion that hot water cools faster (this is true, according to classical physics, the heat transfer rate is proportional to the temperature difference), but maintains an increased cooling rate even when its temperature equals the temperature of cold water. The question is, how does water that has cooled to a temperature of +20C outside differ from exactly the same water that has cooled to a temperature of +20C an hour before, but in a room? Classical physics (by the way, based not on chatter in a smoking room, but on hundreds of thousands and millions of experiments) says: yes, nothing, further cooling dynamics will be the same (only boiling water will reach the +20 point later). And the experiment shows the same thing: when there is already a solid crust of ice in a glass of initially cold water, hot water did not even think of freezing. P.S. To the comments of Yuri Kuznetsov. The presence of a certain effect can be considered established when the conditions for its occurrence are described and it is stably reproduced. And when we have incomprehensible experiments with unknown conditions, it is premature to build theories of their explanation and this does not give anything from a scientific point of view. P.P.S. Well, it’s impossible to read Alexei Mishnev’s comments without tears of emotion - a person lives in some kind of fictional world that has nothing to do with physics and real experiments.

Grigory, 01/13/2014 10:58 AM

Ivan, I understand that you refute the Mpemba effect? It does not exist, as your experiments show? Why is it so famous in physics, and why do many try to explain it?

Ivan , 02/14/2014 01:51

Good afternoon, Gregory! The effect of an impurely staged experiment exists. But, as you understand, this is not a reason to look for new patterns in physics, but a reason to improve the skill of the experimenter. As I already noted in the comments, in all the mentioned attempts to explain the “Mpemba effect”, the researchers cannot even clearly articulate what exactly and under what conditions they are measuring. And you want to say that these are experimental physicists? Do not make me laugh. The effect is known not in physics, but in pseudo-scientific discussions on various forums and blogs, of which the sea is now. As a real physical effect (in the sense as a consequence of some new physical laws, and not as a consequence of an incorrect interpretation or just a myth), people who are far from physics perceive it. So there is no reason to speak as a single physical effect about the results of different experiments set up under completely different conditions.

Pavel, 02/18/2014 09:59

hmm, guys... article for "Speed ​​Info"... No offense... ;) Ivan is right about everything...

Gregory, 02/19/2014 12:50 pm

Ivan, I agree that there are a lot of pseudo-scientific sites publishing unverified sensational material now.? After all, the effect of Mpemba is still being studied. Moreover, scientists from universities are researching. For example, in 2013, this effect was studied by a group from the University of Technology in Singapore. Look at the link http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6514. They believe they have found an explanation for this effect. I will not write in detail about the essence of the discovery, but in their opinion, the effect is associated with the difference in energies stored in hydrogen bonds.

Moiseeva N.P. , 02/19/2014 03:04

For everyone interested in research on the Mpemba effect, I slightly supplemented the material of the article and provided links where you can read latest results(see text). Thanks for the comments.

Ildar , 02/24/2014 04:12 | it makes no sense to list everything

If this Mpemba effect really takes place, then the explanation must be sought, I think, in the molecular structure of water. Water (as I learned from the popular science literature) exists not as individual H2O molecules, but as clusters of several molecules (even dozens). With an increase in water temperature, the speed of movement of molecules increases, the clusters break up against each other and the valence bonds of the molecules do not have time to assemble large clusters. It takes a little more time to form clusters than to slow down the speed of molecules. And since the clusters are smaller, the formation crystal lattice happens faster. In cold water, apparently, large, fairly stable clusters prevent the formation of a lattice; it takes some time for their destruction. I myself saw on TV a curious effect, when cold water standing quietly in a jar remained liquid for several hours in the cold. But as soon as the jar was picked up, that is, slightly moved from its place, the water in the jar immediately crystallized, became opaque, and the jar burst. Well, the priest who showed this effect explained it by the fact that the water was consecrated. By the way, it turns out that water greatly changes its viscosity depending on temperature. We, as large creatures, do not notice this, but at the level of small (mm and less) crustaceans, and even more so bacteria, the viscosity of water is a very significant factor. This viscosity, I think, is also given by the size of the water clusters.

GREY , 03/15/2014 05:30

everything around that we see is surface characteristics (properties), so we take for energy only what we can measure or prove existence in any way, otherwise it is a dead end. this phenomenon, the Mpemba effect can only be explained by a simple volumetric theory that will unite everything physical models into a single structure of interaction. actually it's simple

Nikita, 06/06/2014 04:27 | car

but how to make the water stay cold and not be warm when you go in the car!

alexey, 03.10.2014 01:09

And here is another "discovery", on the go. Water in a plastic bottle freezes much faster with an open stopper. For the sake of fun, I experimented many times in severe frost. The effect is obvious. Hello theorists!

Eugene , 12/27/2014 08:40

The principle of an evaporative cooler. We take two hermetically sealed bottles with cold and hot water. We put it in the cold. Cold water freezes faster. Now we take the same bottles with cold and hot water, open it and put it in the cold. Hot water will freeze faster than cold water. If we take two basins with cold and hot water, then hot water will freeze much faster. This is due to the fact that we increase contact with the atmosphere. The more intense the evaporation, the faster the temperature drop. Here it is necessary to mention the factor of humidity. The lower the humidity, the stronger the evaporation and the stronger the cooling.

gray TOMSK, 03/01/2015 10:55

GREY, 15.03.2014 05:30 - continued What you know about temperature is not everything. There is something else. If you correctly compose a physical model of temperature, then it will become the key to describing energy processes from diffusion, melting and crystallization to such scales as an increase in temperature with an increase in pressure, an increase in pressure with an increase in temperature. Even the physical model of the Sun's energy will become clear from the above. I am in winter. . in the early spring of 20013, after looking at the temperature models, I compiled a general temperature model. After a couple of months, I remembered the temperature paradox, and then I realized ... that my temperature model also describes the Mpemba paradox. This was in May - June 2013. A year late, but that's for the best. My physical model is a freeze frame and it can be scrolled both forward and backward and it has the motor skills of activity, the very activity in which everything moves. I have 8 classes of school and 2 years of college with a repetition of the topic. 20 years have passed. So I can’t ascribe any kind of physical models of famous scientists, as well as formulas. So sorry.

Andrey , 08.11.2015 08:52

In general, I have an idea about why hot water freezes faster than cold water. And in my explanations everything is very simple if you are interested then write me an email: [email protected]

Andrey , 08.11.2015 08:58

I'm sorry, I gave the wrong mailbox here is the correct email: [email protected]

Victor , 12/23/2015 10:37 AM

It seems to me that everything is simpler, snow falls with us, it is evaporated gas, cooled, so maybe in frost it cools faster hot because it evaporates and immediately crystallizes far from rising, and water in a gaseous state cools faster than in liquid)

Bekzhan , 01/28/2016 09:18

Even if someone revealed these laws of the world that are associated with this effect, he would not write here. From my point of view, it would not be logical to reveal his secrets to Internet users when he can publish it on famous scientific journals and prove it personally in front of the people. So, what will be written about this effect here, all this majority is not logical.)))

Alex , 02/22/2016 12:48 PM

Hello Experimenters You are right in saying that Science begins where... not Measurements, but Calculations. "Experiment" - an eternal and indispensable argument for those deprived of Imagination and Linear thinking Offended everyone, now in the case of E \u003d mc2 - does everyone remember? The speed of molecules flying out of cold water into the atmosphere determines the amount of energy they carry away from water (cooling - loss of energy) The speed of molecules from hot water is much higher and the energy carried away is squared (the rate of cooling of the remaining mass of water) That's all, if you leave from " experimentation" and remember the Basics of Science

Vladimir , 04/25/2016 10:53 AM | Meteo

In those days when antifreeze was a rarity, the water from the cooling system of cars in an unheated garage of a car fleet was drained after a working day so as not to defrost the cylinder block or radiator - sometimes both together. Hot water was poured in the morning. In severe frost, the engines started without problems. Somehow, due to the lack of hot water, water was poured from the tap. The water immediately froze. The experiment was expensive - exactly as much as it costs to buy and replace the cylinder block and radiator of a ZIL-131 car. Who does not believe, let him check. and Mpemba experimented with ice cream. In ice cream, crystallization proceeds differently than in water. Try biting off a piece of ice cream and a piece of ice with your teeth. Most likely it did not freeze, but thickened as a result of cooling. And fresh water, whether it is hot or cold, freezes at 0*C. Cold water is fast, but hot water needs time to cool.

Wanderer , 06.05.2016 12:54 | to Alex

"c" - speed of light in vacuum E=mc^2 - formula expressing the equivalence of mass and energy

Albert , 07/27/2016 08:22

First, an analogy with solid bodies(there is no evaporation process). Recently soldered copper water pipes. The process occurs by heating the gas burner to the melting temperature of the solder. The heating time of one joint with the coupling is approximately one minute. I soldered one joint with the coupling and after a couple of minutes I realized that I soldered it wrong. It took a little to scroll the pipe in the coupling. I began to heat the joint again with a burner and, surprisingly, it took 3-4 minutes to heat the joint to the melting point. How so!? After all, the pipe is still hot and it would seem that much less energy is needed to heat it to the melting point, but everything turned out to be the opposite. It's all about the thermal conductivity, which is much higher for an already heated pipe and the boundary between the heated and cold pipes managed to move far from the junction in two minutes. Now about water. We will operate with the concepts of hot and semi-heated vessel. In a hot vessel, a narrow temperature boundary is formed between hot, highly mobile particles and slow-moving, cold ones, which moves relatively quickly from the periphery to the center, because at this boundary, fast particles quickly give up their energy (cool) by particles on the other side of the boundary. Since the volume of the outer cold particles is larger, the fast particles, giving up their thermal energy, cannot significantly heat up the outer cold particles. Therefore, the process of cooling hot water occurs relatively quickly. Semi-heated water, on the other hand, has a much lower thermal conductivity, and the width of the boundary between semi-heated and cold particles is much wider. The displacement to the center of such a wide boundary occurs much more slowly than in the case of a hot vessel. As a result, a hot vessel cools faster than a warm one. I think it is necessary to follow the dynamics of the cooling process of water of different temperatures by placing several temperature sensors from the middle to the edge of the vessel.

Max , 11/19/2016 05:07

It has been verified: in Yamal, in frost, a pipe with hot water freezes and it has to be warmed up, but not cold!

Artem, 09.12.2016 01:25

It is difficult, but I think that cold water is denser than hot water, even better than boiled water, and then there is an acceleration in cooling, i.e. hot water reaches the cold temperature and overtakes it, and if you take into account the fact that hot water freezes from below and not from above, as written above, this speeds up the process a lot!

Alexander Sergeev, 21.08.2017 10:52

There is no such effect. Alas. In 2016, a detailed article on the topic was published in Nature: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect From it it is clear that if the experiments are carried out carefully (if the samples of warm and cold water are the same in everything except temperature), the effect is not observed .

Headlab, 08/22/2017 05:31

Victor , 10/27/2017 03:52 AM

"It really is." - if the school did not understand what heat capacity and the law of conservation of energy are. It's easy to check - for this you need: a desire, a head, hands, water, a refrigerator and an alarm clock. And the skating rinks, as experts write, are frozen (filled) with cold water, and with warm water they level the cut ice. And in the winter you need to pour anti-freeze fluid into the washer reservoir, not water. Water will freeze anyway, and cold water will freeze faster.

Irina , 01/23/2018 10:58

Scientists all over the world have been struggling with this paradox since the time of Aristotle, and Viktor, Zavlab and Sergeev turned out to be the smartest.

Denis , 02/01/2018 08:51

Everything is right in the article. But the reason is somewhat different. In the process of boiling, the air dissolved in it is evaporated from the water, therefore, as the boiling water cools, as a result, its density will be less than that of raw water of the same temperature. There are no other reasons for different thermal conductivity except for different density.

Headlab, 03/01/2018 08:58 | head lab

Irina :), "scientists of the whole world" do not fight this "paradox", for real scientists this "paradox" simply does not exist - this is easily verified in well-reproducible conditions. The "paradox" appeared due to the irreproducible experiments of the African boy Mpemba and was inflated by similar "scientists" :)

miroland, 03/23/2019 07:20 AM

a Tanzanian boy living in the heart of Africa, who, very likely, has never seen snow in his eyes ... ;-D I'm not confusing anything ???)))

Sergey , 04/14/2019 02:02

We take two elastic bands, stretch both, and one is larger than the other (an analogy with the internal energy of cold and warm water), at the same time we release one end of the elastic bands. Which rubber will shrink faster?

Artanis , 05/08/2019 03:34

Just had this experience myself. I put two identical cups of hot and cold water in the freezer. The cold one froze much faster. The hot one was still a little warm. What is wrong in my experience?

Headlab, 05/09/2019 06:21 |

Artanis, With your experience, "everything is right" :) - The "Mpemba effect" does not exist with a correctly performed experiment, which ensures the identity of the cooling conditions for identical volumes of water only with different initial temperatures. Congratulations - you have moved to the side of light, reason and the triumph of basic physical laws and began to move away from the "Mpemba sect", and fans of YouTube videos in the style of "what they lied to us about in physics lessons" ... :)

Moiseeva N.P. , 05/16/2019 04:30 | Ch. editor

You are right, a lot depends on the conditions of the experiment. But if the effect were not observed at all, then there would be no research and publications in serious journals. Did you read the note to the end? There is no mention of YouTube videos here.

Headlab, 08/06/2019 05:26 | SlavOilGas-SouthNorthWestVostok-SintezWhatever

Natalya Petrovna, we are living in an era of a "crisis of reproducibility" in science, when, in order to increase the citation index under the slogan "publish or perish", "unfortunate scientists" prefer to compete in inventing crazy theories to substantiate obviously dubious experimental data instead of spending a little time and resources to verify these data before sitting down to a purely theoretical article. An example of such "unfortunate scientists" is just the "physicists from Singapore" that you mentioned in the article - their publication does not contain their own experimental data, but only bare theoretical arguments about the possible influence of the abstruse phenomenon "O:H-O Bond Anomalous Relaxation" on the process of anomalous freezing of water, which was observed by both Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes and even Aristotle as early as 350 years BC. ... And personally, I am very glad that Nikola Bregovic from the University of Zagreb received his prize 1000 pounds from the Royal Society of Chemistry of Great Britain after he measured quite physically explicable results without any anomalies on good equipment in reproducible conditions and questioned them as clumsy measurements boy Mpemba and his adepts and the adequacy of those who tried to bring these clumsy experiments "theoretical base".

Chemistry was one of my favorite subjects in school. Once a chemistry teacher gave us a very strange and difficult task. He gave us a list of questions that we had to answer in terms of chemistry. We were given several days for this task and were allowed to use libraries and other available sources of information. One of these questions concerned the freezing point of water. I don’t remember exactly how the question sounded, but it was about the fact that if you take two wooden buckets the same size, one with hot water, the other with cold water (at exactly the specified temperature), and put them in an environment with a certain temperature, which one will freeze faster? Of course, the answer immediately suggested itself - a bucket of cold water, but it seemed to us too simple. But this was not enough to give a complete answer, we needed to prove it from a chemical point of view. Despite all my thinking and research, I could not draw a logical conclusion. On this day, I even decided to skip this lesson, so I never found out the solution to this riddle.

Years passed, and I learned a lot of everyday myths about the boiling point and freezing point of water, and one myth said: "hot water freezes faster." I looked at many websites but the information was too conflicting. And these were just opinions, unfounded from the point of view of science. And I decided to conduct my own experience. Since I couldn't find wooden buckets, I used a freezer, stovetop, some water, and a digital thermometer. I will talk about the results of my experience a little later. First, I will share with you some interesting arguments about water:

Hot water freezes faster than cold water. Most experts say that cold water will freeze faster than hot water. But one funny phenomenon (the so-called Memba effect), for unknown reasons, proves the opposite: Hot water freezes faster than cold water. One of several explanations is the evaporation process: if very hot water is placed in a cold environment, then the water will begin to evaporate (the remaining amount of water will freeze faster). And according to the laws of chemistry, this is not a myth at all, and most likely this is what the teacher wanted to hear from us.

Boiled water freezes faster than tap water. Despite the previous explanation, some experts argue that boiled water that has cooled to room temperature should freeze faster because the amount of oxygen is reduced as a result of boiling.

Cold water boils faster than hot water. If hot water freezes faster, then cold water may boil faster! This is contrary to common sense and scientists argue that this simply cannot be. Hot tap water should actually boil faster than cold water. But by using hot water to boil, you don't save energy. You may use less gas or electricity, but the water heater will use the same amount of energy that is needed to heat cold water. (WITH solar energy things are a bit different). As a result of heating the water with a water heater, sediment may form, so the water will take longer to heat up.

If you add salt to water, it will boil faster. Salt increases the boiling point (and therefore lowers the freezing point - which is why some housewives add a little rock salt to ice cream). But in this case, we are interested in another question: how long will the water boil and whether the boiling point in this case can rise above 100 ° C). Despite what is written in cookbooks, scientists argue that the amount of salt we add to boiling water is not enough to affect the boiling time or temperature.

But here's what I got:

Cold water: I used three 100 ml glass beakers of purified water: one room temperature (72°F/22°C), one hot water (115°F/46°C), and one boiled (212 °F/100°C). I placed all three glasses in the freezer at -18°C. And since I knew that water would not immediately turn into ice, I determined the degree of freezing by the “wooden float”. When the stick, placed in the center of the glass, no longer touched the base, I believed that the water had frozen. I checked the glasses every five minutes. And what are my results? The water in the first glass froze after 50 minutes. Hot water froze after 80 minutes. Boiled - after 95 minutes. My Conclusions: Considering the conditions in the freezer and the water I used, I was unable to reproduce the Memba effect.

I also tried this experiment with previously boiled water cooled to room temperature. It froze in 60 minutes - it still took longer than cold water to freeze.

Boiled water: I took a liter of water at room temperature and put it on fire. She boiled in 6 minutes. Then I cooled it down to room temperature again and added it to the hot one. With the same fire, hot water boiled in 4 hours and 30 minutes. Conclusion: as expected, hot water boils much faster.

Boiled water (with salt): I added 2 large tablespoons of table salt to 1 liter of water. It boiled in 6 minutes 33 seconds, and as the thermometer showed it reached a temperature of 102°C. Undoubtedly, salt affects the boiling point, but not much. Conclusion: salt in water does not greatly affect the temperature and boiling time. I honestly admit that my kitchen is hard to call a laboratory, and perhaps my conclusions are contrary to reality. My freezer may freeze food unevenly. My glass glasses might be irregular, etc. But whatever happens in the laboratory, when it comes to freezing or boiling water in the kitchen, the most important thing is common sense.

link with interesting facts about waterall about water
as suggested on the forum.ixbt.com forum, this effect (the effect of freezing hot water faster than cold water) is called the "Aristotle-Mpemba effect"

Those. boiled water (chilled) freezes faster than "raw"