Economy      02/15/2020

What is a human essay on social studies. Essay on social science on the statement "Man is unthinkable outside of society" (L. Tolstoy) (USE social science). Those who know different approaches to the essay win


L. Tolstoy is a great Russian writer and publicist. The works of this great man touch the strings of the reader's soul, L. Tolstoy's merits are recognized all over the world and revered. In this statement, the thinker considers the problem of the social nature of man. In modern sociology, there is still no consensus on which principle plays a dominant role in socialization: biological or sociological.

The thinker is convinced that a person cannot exist outside of society.

It is in society that the values ​​and norms of human behavior are laid, socialization takes place. The social principle prevails over the natural.

I can not but agree with the opinion of the philosopher that social entity human plays an important role in the development and formation of personality.

Let us turn to the theoretical meaning of the statement, as you can see, the presented problem is relevant throughout almost the entire human existence. Man is binary and in order to give life to the spirit, he must provide life for his shell - the body. Personality - an individual with a formed set of socially significant features or qualities. A person at a certain stage of his development will strive for socialization, this is due to the fact that a person does not mindlessly obey instincts, he controls them, in accordance with the norms and ideals of his environment.

The process of socialization is inextricably linked with society. Society is a part of the material world isolated from nature, but closely connected with it, including the ways and forms of human interaction.

D. Defoe in his novel "Robinson Crusoe" considers the problem of socialization of the individual outside of society. The main character of the work is Robinson Crusoe. The ship on which the sailors were sailing was wrecked, Robinson miraculously survived and got on desert island. During his stay on the island, the hero joined nature, got to know it, became one with it, nature replaced society for him. Robinson lived alone with nature for 28 years, but did not lose his dignity, did not become wild, he could remain a man. But this happened solely due to the fact that the hero knew the basic skills and norms of society, because before the incident he was in society, he also did everything not to lose socially significant qualities: he read, kept a diary and improved his knowledge and skills. He satisfied not only biological, but also social needs, the need for communication, Robinson communicated with the parrot, as if the bird were a reasonable interlocutor. Thanks to self-development and perseverance, there was no desocialization of the personality. But it will be very difficult to return to the past life activity, because the process of socialization takes place throughout life, and the hero was alone for most of his existence.

Many nations use the expulsion of a criminal from a social group as the heaviest punishment. Because an individual cannot exist outside of society, because social needs will not be satisfied. Dooming a person to eternal loneliness. So, the hero of the work “The Old Woman Izergil” by M. Gorky Larra, because he killed the girl, was cursed by the tribe for eternal life, the life of an outcast. Happiness for the hero was death, which was impossible, since his existence became meaningless without society, it was no longer life, but an aimless, empty existence.

Thus, man is the center of the intersection of two principles: biological essence and spirit. Only the unity of these principles forms the essence of man.

Updated: 2017-11-01

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and press Ctrl+Enter.
Thus, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

Essay

“Man is unthinkable outside of society” L.N. Tolstoy.

L.N. Tolstoy is a great Russian writer of the second half of the 19th century. His work amazes with philosophical thoughts.

"Man is unthinkable outside of society" - how to understand this?

Man is a biosocial being, possessing thinking, articulate speech, the ability to create tools and use them in the process of social labor, embodying high moral and intellectual properties.

The definition itself shows us that a person is firmly connected with society, which helps him become a person and defend his individuality.

Society is a part of the material world isolated from nature, but closely connected with it, consisting of individuals of people with will, consciousness, including ways of interacting people and forming associations. There is also socialization here, i.e. the process of assimilation by a person of a certain system of knowledge, norms. values ​​that enable it to function as full member society.

From the moment of birth, a child enters not only the natural and social environment, which prepares him for further independent living, starting with the formation of the most elementary functions: nutrition, movement.

Society contains meaning, reason, will. It is legitimate, it concentrates the essence of human existence: everything that distinguishes a person from a pure natural being and reveals his rational and spiritual nature, it forms a human personality.

It is laid down by nature, so that a person interacts with his own kind. Man, from the moment of his appearance, cannot exist without public relations and relationships. The main significance of society lies in the fact that within its framework the survival of the human race, the vital activity of people are ensured reliably and more efficiently than in the isolated existence of each person.

Higher security of life support forced our ancestors to live together. In the era of traditional society, people were collectively engaged in agriculture, gathering, and cattle breeding. Then handicrafts were added to this activity, a person began to engage in creativity, and thus existence continues up to the present. Among the spiritual trials in Japan, there is the “morito” system - placing a person for a week in a cave and a strict ban on talking even with oneself. According to the testimonies of those who passed this test, the thirst for communication by the end of isolation became simply unbearable, a further meeting with a loved one brought the most acute joy to the hermit.

Hence the conclusion that the attraction of a person and establishing contact with other people is a social need.

In the era of information and computer technologies, a person is increasingly immersed in communication. He draws from it important and significant information for himself, which makes him smarter and more readable, helps to realize himself in life and work, to apply knowledge for the benefit and development of society.

Communication is the basis of society when people understand each other, cooperate and implement various projects.

I agree with Leo Tolstoy's statement that "Man is not conceivable outside of society."

Essay

“All our theories are nothing more than a generalization of the experience of observed facts” V.A. Ambartsumyan

Suggested statements by V.A. I would like to consider Ambarutsyan from a philosophical point of view. The meaning of the statement contains such categories as the generalization of experience and the observation of facts in scientific knowledge.

The need for knowledge is one of the characteristics of a person.

Gnoseology is the science of knowledge. To this day there is a dispute between rationalists and sensualists. What knowledge is more important? sensual or rational?

Sensualists believe that knowledge is obtained through sensory experience and the mind is secondary.

Rationalists believe. that a person has reason and reason, which means he can establish connections, give concepts and judgments about objects and phenomena, and draw conclusions.

Rationalists believe that feelings can deceive a person.

At the empirical level, a person can feel and imagine, represent. At the rational stage of cognition, a person can already establish connections between objects and phenomena.
This is where deduction comes in.

I believe that the use of sensory and rational knowledge leads to absolute truth.

For example, the scientist Pasteur for a long time could not understand how cows become infected with anthrax. He began the study by observing that the field on which the animals graze, the grass is yellow in color. He began to study and observe.
Pasteur concluded that earthworms are carriers of anthrax.

They bring the anthrax spores out of the ground. And thus he learned how animals contract disease.

Thus, using sensory and rational knowledge, he revealed the fact of infection with the disease.

For example, the engineer scientist Siemens argued that it is impossible for a person to fly like a bird into the sky, knowing Newton's laws.

On the other hand, the scientist Siemens tried to use various logical, mathematical and philosophical methods.

And he came to the opening.

Even pure theories can lead to new discoveries.

Thus scientific knowledge, it is the work of thought with the help of different methods.


Indeed, not every applicant has literary talents and can fully demonstrate their Creative skills limited time in right place- Here and now! See our social studies essay example.

Let us remember that on USE exam in social science, according to , assigned almost four hours. We take at least 0.5 hours to work with a clean copy of part 1, at least 1 hour to work with a draft, at least 1 hour to work with part 2. What remains? Only 1.5 hours for CREATIVITY. Therefore, having received a quote, you need to work accurately and clearly, fulfilling the CRITERIA of verification!

Only 1 hour to create!
Knowing the pattern and real examples is the key to success!Get ready today!

Those who know different approaches to essays win!

Criterion 1 (K1) - The meaning of the statement is revealed. The expert sees your understanding of the thought expressed by the author. If this criterion is not met, your essay is not checked!

Criterion 2 (K2) - The chosen topic is revealed based on the relevant concepts, theoretical provisions and conclusions. In your essay, you use

Criterion 3 (K3) - The quality of the argumentation of one's point of view. You have a point of view on the problem raised by the author, and justify it with the help of examples from your life, social facts, media information, knowledge from

We have already covered one of the essay writing templates in . Let's bring another one today. The more templates you have in stock, the greater your chances of successfully completing this USE task! Consider another example of an essay on social studies.

Here is the problematic statement being discussed today:

If a person has a “why” to live, he can withstand any “how” (F. Nietzsche)

We fulfill the criteria right away!

Criterion 1 (K1) - The meaning of the statement is revealed:

The great German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in his statement expresses his attitude to the value of human life. He believes that the conditions of life are secondary, the main thing is the desire for the goal.

We show our INTELLIGENCE. This is one of those thinkers whose phrases are most often provided for discussion (along with Churchill, Aristotle, Voltaire, Franklin, Pushkin). It seems that you need to know some information about this figure.

The great German philosopher, composer of the 19th century, author of the works "Thus Spoke Zarathustra", "Human, Too Human", the theory of SUPERMAN.
One of the most controversial thinkers in history.

In the light of the conditions of Nietzsche's life, his influence on the philosophical and political thought of modernity, as well as historical events XIX century, this phrase seems very relevant to me.

We demonstrate our attention to history, the interest shown in the quote. Then, we go through the knowledge of the identity of the author:

Nietzsche entered the history of philosophy as the great Blind Man. All his life he suffered from a gradual loss of vision. He ended his life in terrible pain, completely blind. This did not prevent him from writing a number of outstanding philosophical works, for example, Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

From the course of social science it is known that a person is a biosocial creature that has thinking and speech. Life is a form of activity of any being, manifested in man in activity. Human activity, unlike other animals, is purposeful, not instinctive. Therefore, asking the question of “why” a person should live, he means the purpose of his life.

We reveal the meaning of the quote using a historical example - the living conditions are terrible (pain, blindness), but the goal has been achieved! We show the knowledge of the basic social science terms necessary for reasoning on this quote - (go to criterion 2).

The key idea of ​​Nietzsche's writings is the idea of ​​the "superman". This is a political giant, a leader who challenges the base interests of the crowd. He puts high spiritual ideals before her, subjugates her, leads her after him. Many see the works of Nietzsche as a philosophical justification for the formation of totalitarian ideologies and states.XX century, fascism.

  • Frizzle Fraz 2

    The longer the sentence, the better, according to some candidates. However, this is far from the truth. Long phrases do not yet prove the correctness of the author, and short sentences often have a greater effect. It is best when in an essay long phrases alternate with short ones. Try reading the essay aloud. If you feel like you are out of breath, break the paragraph into smaller paragraphs.

  • Vlad

    Fabulous!!! Thank you, you are great!!!

  • Diana
  • Most often, students have to write essays on this subject. At leisure, I wrote an essay on social studies, maybe this example will be useful to someone.

    Social Studies Essay:

    According to L. Feuerbach, man is a part of nature, a biological, sensual-bodily being. It is impossible not to agree with his opinion. Man, whose development process - anthropogenesis began more than 2 million years ago, really combines the biological and spiritual principles.

    Exist various theories his appearance. The largest number adherents has evolutionary. In accordance with this theory, developed by the naturalist Ch. Darwin, modern people descended from the great apes. Some are of the opinion that life came to the planet from outer space. According to theological theory, man was created by God, and the basis for this was the dust of the earth. After its appearance, anthropogenesis begins.

    This process combines the formation of society and man as an individual and personality. All these concepts characterize it from different positions, but prove the combination of natural and spiritual features in it. Man is a biological being, first of all, because he is a part of nature. In addition, he has instincts, base needs. The products of the activity of nature in the human body are the body and the brain. All these characteristics support Feuerbach's idea of ​​biological traits.

    As a spiritual being, a person is characterized by the ability to suppress and control instincts. Many qualities, such as the ability to communicate, speech, thinking and a number of other skills, appear only among people. A person does not imagine himself outside of society. This is evidenced by the concept of N.M. Karamzin personality. It includes the definition of man as a social being. In other words, a person is formed only in society and functions most effectively there. It is no coincidence that people who grew up outside of society among animals are qualitatively different from individuals who were brought up among their own kind.

    The ability to control instincts is the most striking argument confirming that a person is a sensual-bodily being. social norms, upbringing, morality - all this does not allow individuals to act, focusing solely on their desires. Feelings play an important role in human actions. The proof of this is the behavior of people in difficult situations. Mercy for the wounded, compassion, for example, became stronger than the sense of self-preservation among nurses who rescued soldiers under bullets during the Great Patriotic War.

    In conclusion, it is worth noting that Feuerbach is absolutely right in characterizing man as both a natural and sensual-corporeal being. From birth, possessing exclusively biological features, the individual in the process of socialization becomes a personality, in which his spiritual principle is manifested.

    Essay on the topic of a person, Example of an essay on social studies, ready-made essay on social studies, best essay on social studies

    Man is responsible for what he is.... Jean-Paul Sartre

    Over the statement of Jean-Paul Sartre A man is responsible for what he is, a French philosopher, I thought about assessing my actions and the actions of my loved ones. The purpose of writing an essay on social science on the topic Man was the answer to the question, Why is a person responsible for being a person? Growing up, a person acquires obligations and guaranteed rights. Responsibilities change as a person ages, and so does his duty. Man's duty to himself, to his immediate environment, to the society of which he is a part, or even to humanity as a whole. All people are responsible for their actions, for their actions you can receive a reward or be punished. As a result of his actions, he becomes what he is now.

    This can be confirmed by the concept - MAN.
    Man is a socio-biological being that embodies the highest level in the evolution of life and being the subject of socio-historical activity and communication.
    Using the concept of Man, psychologists emphasize that a person is a biological and social being at the same time, which, through its vital activity, influences the environment.
    Living in a society, defining your life path- a person finds himself and the way he will become, what he will bring with him into life, only he himself is to blame. Summing up life, you can see that someone has achieved a result, success in life, growth in a career, created a good family, raised good children, or was engaged in social activities, was a politician and brought many benefits to society. And others did not think about their actions, one wrong step brought a side result and punishment for misconduct or even worse a crime. It is bad when a person does not think about what he has done and continues to do bad things. After all, in the end he will be responsible for what he did.
    Man is responsible for being a man.... In my understanding, a person is not just a biological being that eats, drinks and sleeps. A person is an individual who acts, constantly improves, is self-critical, benefits others, can change not only himself, but also the world around. He is responsible primarily to himself, because in the end there is in the character of every normal person, the concept of conscience, duty to parents, children, others.
    Also responsible to society. Society, in a broad sense, is a part of the material world isolated from nature, but closely connected with it, consisting of people united by historically established forms of interaction. Society, in the narrow sense, is a group of people connected with each other through permanent relationships, or a large social group with a common geographical or social territory, subject to a single political power and dominant culture. The society in which a person exists will definitely appreciate everyone. And there are clear examples of this in life.
    Citizen N. graduated from high school, entered a prestigious university, got a job, and has been climbing the career ladder for several years. He enjoys well-deserved respect in society, his actions are beneficial, his labors are not in vain.
    But citizen R. once stole in a store, the theft went unnoticed, no punishment followed, this person did not think that he had done something bad and the punishment would come sooner or later. Since then, he has been stealing, but for larger amounts. Once he was caught, he served time in prison. When he was released, he was not hired for a single job, the girls did not see him as a serious young man, the status of "criminal" did not leave him. And only then this citizen realized that he is responsible for his present, no one is to blame for what happened.
    I believe that the above confirms the correctness of the statement