Nearly 617,000 people took the exam. Average score on the Unified State Examination in the Russian language in 2017 is comparable to last year's result.
The minimum threshold for obtaining a certificate of 24 points was not overcome by 0.5% of the exam participants (in 2016, their number was 1%).
“This year, the trend of improving results in compulsory subjects continues. The share of graduates who were left without certificates decreased by almost 1.5 times, and this is without taking into account the results of the upcoming retakes. These results testify to the success of the project “I will pass the USE” and are the result of serious targeted work that was carried out with lagging schoolchildren in regions and municipalities where the results USE past years revealed serious problems with level school education”, - said the head of Rosobrnadzor Sergey Kravtsov.
The minimum threshold of 36 points, below which universities cannot set the USE passing score in the Russian language for applicants, could not be overcome by 1.6% of participants. In 2016 the number USE participants in the Russian language, who did not overcome this threshold, amounted to 2.5%.
Thanks to the large-scale introduction of a new technology for scanning the work of participants at the examination points (EPS), the verification of work and the processing of the results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language was completed ahead of schedule. Exam participants will be able to find out their result five days earlier - from June 22.
Graduates of the current year who could not score the required for obtaining a certificate minimum score at the Unified State Examination in Russian, but received a positive result on the Unified State Examination in mathematics, they will be able to retake the Russian language in a reserve period passing the exam- June 29.
Svetlana Gaysina,
Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And check USE work along with teachers, university professors. Strange article.
I'm afraid you don't understand everything or don't know everything. The weak are really pulled out. Not without it. Here is a story that a former relative told me. He went to enter the university for a paid department with a shortage. There were several adults who had sour school results (more than 5 years). All of them were brought into the audience and handed out kims and answers in three subjects at once. It was only necessary to carefully rewrite the numbers and scribble something in the essay. Based on this bizarre exam, a relative was enrolled in a university. And God would be with him, whoever was accepted, let him be taught. But these scores are fixed somewhere, and on the trail. a year you can go with them to a decent university.
Svetlana Gaysina,
Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Marina Sukhoterina,
Svetlana Gaysina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was tested in my subject. Some moments struck me and alerted me (was not this year)Someone checks in just a day about 45 works, let's say. Afraid to do wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put a higher score. Although, it really shouldn't be.
Another checks as many as 120 entries a day. Diagonally. With a dissatisfied face. (experts are forced to be!).
The third one just checks honestly. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, just honestly pulling the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on.
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the backdrop of the scandals that have sounded, from which the bureaucrats have come out unscathed!
Oksana Gorbacheva,
Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaysina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was tested in my subject. Some moments struck me and alerted me (was not this year)Someone checks in just a day about 45 works, let's say. Afraid to do wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put a higher score. Although, it really shouldn't be.
Another checks as many as 120 entries a day. Diagonally. With a dissatisfied face. (experts are forced to be!).
The third one just checks honestly. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, just honestly pulling the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on.
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the backdrop of the scandals that have sounded, from which the bureaucrats have come out unscathed!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, the second one still checks it, if the discrepancy is 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for the 3rd check. Finally, you can appeal.Experts DO NOT KNOW from which class and which student wrote the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
Checks are often subjective!
Marina Sukhoterina,
Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaysina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was tested in my subject. Some moments struck me and alerted me (was not this year)Someone checks in just a day about 45 works, let's say. Afraid to do wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put a higher score. Although, it really shouldn't be.
Another checks as many as 120 entries a day. Diagonally. With a dissatisfied face. (experts are forced to be!).
The third one just checks honestly. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, just honestly pulling the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on.
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the backdrop of the scandals that have sounded, from which the bureaucrats have come out unscathed!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, the second one still checks it, if the discrepancy is 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for the 3rd check. Finally, you can appeal.Experts DO NOT KNOW from which class and which student wrote the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
Talking is useless! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.
Oksana Gorbacheva,
Marina Sukhoterina,Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaysina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was tested in my subject. Some moments struck me and alerted me (was not this year)Someone checks in just a day about 45 works, let's say. Afraid to do wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put a higher score. Although, it really shouldn't be.
Another checks as many as 120 entries a day. Diagonally. With a dissatisfied face. (experts are forced to be!).
The third one just checks honestly. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, just honestly pulling the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on.
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the backdrop of the scandals that have sounded, from which the bureaucrats have come out unscathed!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, the second one still checks it, if the discrepancy is 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for the 3rd check. Finally, you can appeal.Experts DO NOT KNOW from which class and which student wrote the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
Talking is useless! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.
I read scans of works.
That's all the explanation.
All!
Marina Sukhoterina,
Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Oksana Gorbacheva,Marina Sukhoterina,Svetlana Gaysina,Strange reasoning about a subject in which the author not only does not understand, but simply has no idea ... indeed, in the author's position there is neither justice nor the previous level of journalistic education, even the logic in the presentation is absent. How can there be the worst among the best? Evaluation criteria for all alone, experts do not see either the names or schools where graduates study, and part of the work is evaluated by experts from other regions. And university teachers check the work of the Unified State Examination on a par with teachers. Strange article.
Not weird. I was tested in my subject. Some moments struck me and alerted me (was not this year)Someone checks in just a day about 45 works, let's say. Afraid to do wrong. He has only these 45 works. And he can, after reading everything, return to the best of this pile, put a higher score. Although, it really shouldn't be.
Another checks as many as 120 entries a day. Diagonally. With a dissatisfied face. (experts are forced to be!).
The third one just checks honestly. He is an ordinary teacher, without titles and shoulder straps, just honestly pulling the strap ...
As for university students, let them check, sit on the exam, and so on.
I think they will soon get tired of it, especially against the backdrop of the scandals that have sounded, from which the bureaucrats have come out unscathed!
AND? No matter how one expert checks the work, the second one still checks it, if the discrepancy is 2 or more points, the work is automatically sent for the 3rd check. Finally, you can appeal.Experts DO NOT KNOW from which class and which student wrote the work.
It is a pity that the teachers' council is engaged in populism.
Talking is useless! There is no smell of populism here!
Checks are often subjective!
Explain. Seriously.I read scans of works.
That's all the explanation.
I disagree with many points, especially the essay.
All!
Points did not meet the criteria?
Have you filed an appeal? Results?
Single State exam in Russian is a mandatory exam. In total, 616,590 people took part in the main period of the USE in the Russian language in 2017 (in 2016 - 658,392 people; in 2015 - 672,407 people).
The results of the USE in the Russian language in 2017 are generally comparable with the results of the USE in previous years.
On the official website of FIPI in the section "Analytical and teaching materials"published" Guidelines for teachers prepared on the basis of the analysis common mistakes participants of the USE 2017", it is here that you can find information about what was the average USE score in the Russian language in 2017.
Download document.
Table 1
Average USE score in the Russian language 2015 - 2017
| Year | Average test score | Test score range | ||||
| 0–20 | 21–40 | 41–60 | 61–80 | 81–100 | ||
| 2017 | 69,06 | 0,43% | 2,62% | 23,61% | 48,30% | 25,04% |
| 2016 | 68,5 | 0,82% | 3,40% | 24,45% | 45,75% | 25,58% |
| 2015 | 66,16 | 1,69% | 4,79% | 26,98% | 46,75% | 19,80% |
The share of examinees who scored 100 points on the exam results remained unchanged compared to 2016 - 0.5%. The share of high scorers also remains stable: 25.5% in 2016 and 25% in 2017.
In 2017, the share of graduates who did not pass minimum threshold(those who did not receive the minimum (24) test score): from 0.99% (2016) to 0.54% (2017). The main reasons for the decline in the share of such participants in the Russian language include the successful implementation of the system of measures of Rosobrnadzor to improve the quality of teaching the Russian language in the subjects Russian Federation. Data on the change in the number and share of 100-point students in 2015–2017 are given in table. 2.
table 2
Overall performance statistics individual tasks allows you to identify the main problems in the preparation of examinees in the Russian language. As in previous years, the sections of the course related to the formation of communicative competence remain insufficiently learned. Insufficiently developed skills of analytical work with the word and text, the lack of sufficient practice in the analysis of linguistic phenomena also affect the quality of writing an essay-reasoning. Graduates experience the greatest difficulties when applying punctuation and spelling norms in written speech.
An interesting article is presented on the site "Teach at School" Average USE score 2017 in Russian, based on other data from the Internet.
A few days earlier, information appeared about an innovation that became a reality in 2017. It turned out that the results of the USE 2017 in the Russian language will be issued five days ahead of schedule and graduates will be able to receive graduation certificates before graduation balls.
Already today, on the twenty-second of June, the first results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language appeared on the Internet. You can get them on the website ege.edu.ru. The minimum threshold of 36 points required for admission to universities, this year, 1.6% of participants did not overcome the USE in the Russian language, which is one and a half times less than a year ago. The Federal Service for Supervision in Education and Science has summed up the preliminary results of the Unified State Examination in the Russian language, which was held on June 9. Almost 617 thousand people took the exam. The average score remained the same as last year. The average score on the Unified State Examination in the Russian language in 2017 is comparable to last year's result.
USE-2017 results
This year, 0.5% of exam participants who have not overcome the minimum threshold of 24 points will not be able to receive a certificate. “The share of graduates who were left without certificates has decreased by almost 1.5 times, and this is without taking into account the results of the upcoming retakes,” Kravtsov noted. According to him, this is the result of the “I'll Pass the Unified State Examination” project, serious targeted work with lagging schoolchildren in regions and municipalities, where the results of the Unified State Examination of previous years have revealed serious problems with the level of school education.
The minimum threshold of 36 points, below which universities cannot set the USE passing score in the Russian language for applicants, could not be overcome by 1.6% of participants. In 2016, the number of USE participants in the Russian language who did not overcome this threshold was 2.5%.
At the same time, it should be clarified that the main period of the USE 2017 continues reserve days for the surrender of all USE subjects, which will be held from June 20 to July 1. Graduates of previous years, as well as graduates of the current year who received an unsatisfactory result in one of the compulsory subjects(Russian language and mathematics), or missed the exam for a good reason.
Where to find out the results of the OGE according to passport data in 2019, let's try to figure it out on this page of our website.
On the official website of Rosobrnadzor on the Question - Answer page, the following information is provided:
On the official website of information support of the OGE, this information is duplicated. But there is a section, see the screenshot, where you can find the website of the local administration of your region, where the results of the OGE are published. The region can be selected by clicking on the map.
There is a similar section on the official website of the USE information support. There are more relevant working links here. In general, a complete disgrace - the state spends such money on holding the exam and OGE, and the information on the regions on these sites is not always up-to-date.
It remains to look for your OGE results on the websites of the department of education of the region or region.
If your region is actively engaged in information support for the OGE, then their website is understandable and the results appear quickly.
This is how the site with the results of the OGE 2019 of the Oryol region looks like:
It is not always necessary to enter passport data, some areas lay out tables from which you can find out your result.
Where the sites are advanced, the entry of passport data is required. This is how the site of the Republic of Tyva looks like:
When entering your passport data, be careful, as there are scam sites that illegally collect personal information.
Some regional sites offer to contact the school, where you can find out the most reliable information about OGE results(GIA-9 class).
