The most dangerous period for Russia will come in the early 2020s, when the technological re-equipment of developed countries and China begins, and the United States and others Western countries come out of the depression of 2008–2018. and make a new technological leap.
The risks of a third world war will persist until the US leadership gives up its claims to global dominance. Along with the Ukrainian hotbed of fomenting a world chaotic war, the United States continues to support armed conflicts in Syria and Iraq, destabilize the situation in the Middle East, prepare for the invasion of the Taliban and Islamic militants in Central Asia, design "color revolutions" in Russia and other countries of Eurasian integration, and organize coup d'état in countries out of control of Washington Latin America. The United States is being pushed towards a world war by the objective laws of global economic and political dynamics. Their understanding makes it possible to predict military-political activity for the next decade.
An analysis of the economic and political dynamics shows that the most likely period of major regional military conflicts involving the United States and its satellites against Russia is 2015-2018.
This is the period of the exit of a new technological order from the birth phase into the growth phase, when the formation of its technological trajectory is completed and the modernization of the economy begins on its basis. It is during this period that technological shifts entail changes in the structure international relations. Countries that have risen to the wave of growth of a new technological order earlier than others are gaining competitive advantages in the world market and are beginning to push the former leaders, who have to make great efforts to overcome the crisis of capital overaccumulation in outdated production and technological structures. A struggle is unfolding between new and old leaders of technical and economic development for dominance in the world market, which leads to an increase in international tension and provokes military-political conflicts that have so far led to world wars. It is this period that begins at the present time, which will last until 2020-2022, when the structure of the new technological order is finally formed, and the world economy enters a phase of sustainable growth based on it.
…It should be noted that the Ukrainian crisis began earlier than the forecast estimate.
If Yanukovych had signed an association agreement with the EU in November, then everything would have happened a year and a half later, at the time of the next presidential election.
By that time, the mechanisms for managing the economic, foreign and defense policy of Ukraine by the EU, provided for by this agreement, would have started to work. The newly formed Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian battalions would have already been created and deployed on the borders with Russia. The procedures for joint actions of European and Ukrainian armed forces in the settlement of regional conflicts. Although the agreement provides for Ukraine's obligation to act in these conflicts under the leadership of the EU, as well as to follow its foreign and defense policies, it is clear that the real organization of military operations will be handled by NATO under the leadership of Washington.
There is no doubt that at the time of the presidential elections in the spring of 2015, the same techniques would have been used to replace Yanukovych with a US protege as during the coup d'état last winter. Only the change of power would have been carried out in a relatively legitimate way, which excluded Russian interference in Ukrainian affairs, not to mention reunification with Crimea. The government and law enforcement agencies in Kyiv formed by the Americans from their agents would have taken a course towards joining Ukraine to NATO and ousting Black Sea Fleet Russia from Crimea. Russia would be opposed not by Nazi bandit formations, but by completely legitimate Ukrainian-European military contingents relying on the entire military might of NATO. A US-led legitimate Ukrainian government would break off cooperation with Russia in the defense industry, start an anti-Russian media campaign no less rabid than now, and force the Ukrainization of the South-East of Ukraine. Russia would be in a much worse position than now: after reunification with Crimea and the establishment of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, whose illegitimacy and criminal actions doom Ukraine to catastrophe and collapse.
Of course, the socio-economic catastrophe that has engulfed Ukraine and the growing chaos in this territory do not meet the interests of Russia, for which Ukraine has been and remains an integral part of the Russian world, technologically, economically and spiritually connected with the Russian Federation. The catastrophic scenario could have been avoided if Yanukovych had not followed the lead of American and European emissaries, protected the state from the Nazi rebellion and prevented a coup d'état. However, for the United States, this would be tantamount to defeat in the long anti-Russian campaign that they waged in Ukraine throughout the post-Soviet period. Therefore, everything possible and impossible was done with the involvement of gigantic political, informational and financial resources to organize a coup d'état in Kyiv with the transfer of power over Ukraine to pro-American agents of influence. Yes, for this adventure - if Russia conducts a competent and decisive defense of itself and the world from the American policy of unleashing a world chaotic war - the United States risks paying with its ideological and political leadership. But, apparently, "Paris is worth the mass" - the American policy in pursuit of maximum geostrategic "profit" has ceased to take into account the associated risks.
From 2017, a new electoral cycle will begin in the United States, which, most likely, will be mixed up with Russophobia as the ideological basis of the coming world war.
By that time, the crisis in the American financial system may manifest itself in a reduction in budget expenditures, a depreciation of the dollar, and a tangible deterioration in the standard of living of the population. External US aggression may bog down in the Middle East and fail in Afghanistan and Iraq. The pressure of internal problems and crises in foreign policy, on the one hand, will provoke an increase in the aggressiveness of the American leadership, and, on the other hand, will weaken its position. But in the case of intellectual, economic and military mobilization, Russia has a chance not to lose in the conflicts of 2015-2018, since the United States and its satellites will not yet be ready for open aggression.
But in the period 2021-2025. Russia may again lag behind technologically and economically, which will devalue its defense potential and sharply intensify internal social and interethnic conflicts, as happened with the USSR in the late 1980s.
American analysts from the CIA and other agencies are directly betting on the collapse of Russia from within after 2020.
This will happen, in their opinion, due to internal social and interethnic conflicts initiated from the outside using the problems of social and regional inequality, as well as a decrease in the standard of living of the population of our country.
To this end, the United States is consistently cultivating its "fifth column" among the Russian political, business and intellectual elite, allocating for these purposes, according to some estimates, up to $10 billion a year. The recent appointment of John Tefft, the most famous organizer of "color revolutions" and coup d'état in the post-Soviet space, as the new US ambassador to Russia, testifies to the same.
To avoid the implementation of the most negative scenario for Russia, leading to the disintegration of the country, a systemic internal and foreign policy fortifications national security, ensuring economic independence, increasing international competitiveness and advancing the development of the national economy, mobilizing society and modernizing the defense industry. By 2017, when the new technological order enters the growth phase, and the struggle for world leadership reaches its maximum intensity, Russian army must have modern and effective weapons, Russian society- to be united and self-confident, the Russian intellectual elite - to own new technologies, the Russian economy - to be on the wave of growth of a new technological order, and Russian politics and diplomacy - to organize a broad anti-war coalition of countries that are not interested in starting a new world war and are capable of stopping American aggression by concerted actions.
Such an international coalition is needed not only to prevent war, but also to win it if war turns out to be inevitable.
An anti-war coalition could include:
European countries that are drawn into the war against Russia contrary to their national interests;
The BRICS countries, whose economic growth can be torpedoed by the global destabilization organized by the USA;
Korea, the countries of Indochina, which are not interested in worsening relations with Russia;
The countries of the Near and Middle East, for which a world war will mean an escalation of their own regional conflicts;
Latin American countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, for which the unwinding of a new world war means a direct US invasion;
Developing countries of the Group of 77, heirs of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, traditionally opposed to wars, for a just world order.
As an incentive for the creation of such a coalition, it is necessary to put forward the common threats for all its members that the United States will unleash a global chaotic war. An important condition The successful creation of such a coalition, as noted above, is to deprive the United States of its monopoly on ideological dominance by consistently exposing the inhuman consequences of their interventions, the massacres of civilians by their military personnel, and the devastating results of the rule of American proteges in various countries.
It is necessary to destroy the image of American infallibility, to expose the cynicism and deception on the part of American leaders, the catastrophic consequences of their policy of double standards, the incompetence and ignorance of American officials and politicians.
Influential allies in the creation of an anti-war coalition could be religious organizations opposing the inculcation of the cult of permissiveness and debauchery, the undermining of family and other universal values. They would help the members of the coalition to work out and offer the world a new unifying ideology based on the restoration of the unshakable moral limits of human arbitrariness. A constructive role could be played by international humanitarian and anti-fascist organizations. An ally could be the world scientific and expert community, speaking from the standpoint of sustainable development and generating development projects that unite humanity.
The actions of the anti-war coalition should be aimed not only at exposing and destroying the political dominance of the United States, but, above all, at undermining the American military-political power based on the issuance of the dollar as a world currency. In the event that the aggressive actions of the United States to foment a world war continue, they should include a refusal to use the dollar in mutual trade and from dollar instruments for placing its gold and foreign exchange assets.
The anti-war coalition must develop a positive program for organizing the global financial and economic architecture on the principles of mutual benefit, justice and respect for national sovereignty.
We have already mentioned above the measures necessary for this to achieve financial stabilization, improve the efficiency of regulation of the financial market, banking, financial and investment institutions, stimulate the growth of a new technological order and progressive structural changes, and form appropriate new institutions. They must address the fundamental causes of the global crisis.
Dear readers! We invite you to subscribe to our
The most dangerous period for Russia will come in the early 2020s, when the technological re-equipment of developed countries and China will begin, and the United States and other Western countries will emerge from the depression of 2008-2018. and make a new technological leap.
The risks of a third world war will persist until the US leadership gives up its claims to global dominance. Along with the Ukrainian hotbed of fomenting a world chaotic war, the United States continues to support armed conflicts in Syria and Iraq, destabilize the situation in the Middle East, prepare an invasion of the Taliban and Islamic militants in Central Asia, design "color revolutions" in Russia and other countries of Eurasian integration, and also organize coups d'état in countries of Latin America that have escaped Washington's control. The United States is being pushed towards a world war by the objective laws of global economic and political dynamics. Their understanding makes it possible to predict military-political activity for the next decade.
An analysis of the economic and political dynamics shows that the most likely period of major regional military conflicts involving the United States and its satellites against Russia is 2015-2018.
This is the period of the exit of a new technological order from the birth phase into the growth phase, when the formation of its technological trajectory is completed and the modernization of the economy begins on its basis. It is during this period that technological shifts entail changes in the structure of international relations. Countries that have risen to the wave of growth of a new technological order earlier than others are gaining competitive advantages in the world market and are beginning to push the former leaders, who have to make great efforts to overcome the crisis of capital overaccumulation in outdated production and technological structures.
A struggle is unfolding between new and old leaders of technical and economic development for dominance in the world market, which leads to an increase in international tension and provokes military-political conflicts that have so far led to world wars. It is this period that begins at the present time, which will last until 2020-2022,
when the structure of a new technological order is finally formed, and the world economy enters a phase of sustainable growth based on it.
…It should be noted that the Ukrainian crisis began earlier than the forecast estimate.
If Yanukovych had signed an association agreement with the EU in November, then everything would have happened a year and a half later, at the time of the next presidential election.
By that time, the mechanisms for managing the economic, foreign and defense policy of Ukraine by the EU, provided for by this agreement, would have started to work. The newly formed Ukrainian-Polish-Lithuanian battalions would have already been created and deployed on the borders with Russia. The procedures for joint actions of the European and Ukrainian armed forces in the settlement of regional conflicts would be worked out. Although the agreement provides for Ukraine's obligation to act in these conflicts under the leadership of the EU, as well as to follow its foreign and defense policies, it is clear that the real organization of military operations will be handled by NATO under the leadership of Washington.
There is no doubt that at the time of the presidential elections in the spring of 2015, the same techniques would have been used to replace Yanukovych with a US protege as during the coup d'état last winter. Only the change of power would have been carried out in a relatively legitimate way, which excluded Russian interference in Ukrainian affairs, not to mention reunification with Crimea. The government and law enforcement agencies in Kyiv, formed by the Americans from their agents, would have taken a course towards joining Ukraine to NATO and ousting the Russian Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Russia would be opposed not by Nazi bandit formations, but by completely legitimate Ukrainian-European military contingents relying on the entire military might of NATO. A US-led legitimate Ukrainian government would break off cooperation with Russia in the defense industry, start an anti-Russian media campaign no less rabid than now, and force the Ukrainization of the South-East of Ukraine. Russia would be in a much worse position than now: after reunification with Crimea and the establishment of the Nazi regime in Kyiv, whose illegitimacy and criminal actions doom Ukraine to catastrophe and collapse.
The socio-economic catastrophe that has engulfed Ukraine and the growing chaos in this territory do not meet the interests of Russia, for which Ukraine has been and remains an integral part of the Russian world, technologically, economically and spiritually connected with the Russian Federation. The catastrophic scenario could have been avoided if Yanukovych had not followed the lead of American and European emissaries, protected the state from the Nazi rebellion and prevented a coup d'état.
However, for the United States, this would be tantamount to defeat in the long anti-Russian campaign that they waged in Ukraine throughout the post-Soviet period. Therefore, everything possible and impossible was done with the involvement of gigantic political, informational and financial resources to organize a coup d'état in Kyiv with the transfer of power over Ukraine to pro-American agents of influence. Yes, for this adventure - if Russia conducts a competent and decisive defense of itself and the world from the American policy of unleashing a world chaotic war - the United States risks paying with its ideological and political leadership. But, apparently, "Paris is worth the mass" - American policy in pursuit of maximum geostrategic "profit" has ceased to take into account the associated risks.
From 2017, a new electoral cycle will begin in the United States, which, most likely, will be mixed up with Russophobia as the ideological basis of the coming world war.
By that time, the crisis in the American financial system may manifest itself in a reduction in budget expenditures, a depreciation of the dollar, and a tangible deterioration in the standard of living of the population. External US aggression may bog down in the Middle East and fail in Afghanistan and Iraq. The pressure of internal problems and crises in foreign policy, on the one hand, will provoke an increase in the aggressiveness of the American leadership, and on the other hand, will weaken its position. But in the case of intellectual, economic and military mobilization, Russia has a chance not to lose in the conflicts of 2015-2018, since the United States and its satellites will not yet be ready for open aggression.
But in the period 2021-2025. Russia may again lag behind technologically and economically, which will devalue its defense potential and sharply intensify internal social and interethnic conflicts, as happened with the USSR in the late 1980s.
American analysts from the CIA and other agencies are directly betting on the collapse of Russia from within after 2020.
This will happen, in their opinion, due to internal social and interethnic conflicts initiated from outside using the problems of social and regional inequality, as well as a decrease in the standard of living of the population of our country.
To this end, the United States is consistently cultivating its "fifth column" among the Russian political, business and intellectual elite, allocating for these purposes, according to some estimates, up to $10 billion a year. The recent appointment of John Tefft, the most well-known organizer of "color revolutions" and coup d'état in the post-Soviet space, as the new US ambassador to Russia testifies to the same.
To avoid the implementation of the most negative scenario for Russia, leading to the disintegration of the country, a systemic domestic and foreign policy is needed to strengthen national security, ensure economic independence, increase international competitiveness and accelerate the development of the national economy, mobilize society and modernize the defense industry.
By 2017, when the new technological order enters the growth phase, and the struggle for world leadership reaches its maximum intensity, the Russian army must have modern and effective weapons, Russian society must be united and self-confident, and the Russian intellectual elite must own new technologies , the Russian economy - to be on the wave of growth of a new technological order, and Russian politics and diplomacy - to organize a broad anti-war coalition of countries,
not interested in unleashing a new world war and capable of stopping American aggression by concerted action.
Such an international coalition is needed not only to prevent war, but also to win it if war turns out to be inevitable.
An anti-war coalition could include:
- European countries that are drawn into the war against Russia contrary to their national interests;
— the BRICS countries, whose economic growth can be torpedoed by the global destabilization organized by the United States;
- Korea, the countries of Indochina, which are not interested in worsening relations with Russia;
- the countries of the Near and Middle East, for which a world war will mean an escalation of their own regional conflicts;
- the Latin American countries of the Bolivarian Alliance, for which the unwinding of a new world war means a direct US invasion;
- developing countries of the "Group of 77", heirs of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, traditionally opposed to wars, for a just world order.
As an incentive for the creation of such a coalition, it is necessary to put forward the common threats for all its members that the United States will unleash a global chaotic war. An important condition for the successful creation of such a coalition, as noted above, is to deprive the United States of its monopoly on ideological dominance by consistently exposing the inhuman consequences of their interventions, the massacres of civilians by their military personnel, and the destructive results of the rule of American proteges in various countries.
It is necessary to destroy the image of American infallibility, to expose the cynicism and deception on the part of American leaders, the catastrophic consequences of their policy of double standards, the incompetence and ignorance of American officials and politicians.
Influential allies in the creation of an anti-war coalition could be religious organizations that oppose the inculcation of the cult of permissiveness and debauchery, the undermining of family and other universal values. They would help the members of the coalition to work out and offer the world a new unifying ideology based on the restoration of the unshakable moral limits of human arbitrariness. A constructive role could be played by international humanitarian and anti-fascist organizations. An ally could be the world scientific and expert community, speaking from the standpoint of sustainable development and generating development projects that unite humanity.
The actions of the anti-war coalition should be aimed not only at exposing and destroying the political dominance of the United States, but, above all, at undermining the American military and political power based on the issuance of the dollar as a world currency. In the event that the aggressive actions of the United States to foment a world war continue, they should include a refusal to use the dollar in mutual trade and from dollar instruments for placing its gold and foreign exchange assets.
The anti-war coalition must develop a positive program for organizing the global financial and economic architecture on the principles of mutual benefit, justice and respect for national sovereignty.
We have already mentioned above the measures necessary for this to achieve financial stabilization, improve the efficiency of regulation of the financial market, banking, financial and investment institutions, stimulate the growth of a new technological order and progressive structural changes, and form appropriate new institutions. They must address the fundamental causes of the global crisis.
Experts are confident that the world is on the verge of war and name 10 potential military conflicts that could erupt literally tomorrow.
1. Sino-Russian Siberian War
One superpower is going through hard times. Another superpower is actually ready to conquer the whole world. On this moment China and Russia are "big players" in the territory east of Ural mountains. Both countries have huge armies. Both have nuclear weapon. Both are expansionist. And both have claims to Siberia - sparsely populated, rich natural resources territory larger than Canada. Siberia has long been in the sphere of China's interests.
IN Lately The Celestial Empire began to actively buy up plots of Siberian land. Beijing is now beginning to make historical claims, at least to the eastern part of Siberia, where many ethnic Chinese live. For Moscow, this is becoming an increasing problem. A potential Sino-Russian war over Siberian territory could be devastating and there are only two possible outcomes. Either the Chinese army will recapture most of Russia, or Moscow will unleash a nuclear war. In any case, the death toll will have catastrophic consequences for the entire world.
2. War for the Baltic
Recently, Europe has become quite worried about the possibility of war with Russia. According to former NATO Deputy Commander Alexander Richard Shirreff, this is a very possible scenario. Shirreff believes possible cause This is Russia's unwillingness to be surrounded by NATO countries. According to the British general, as early as May 2017, Moscow will build a land corridor through Ukraine, connecting Crimea with Russia, and then invade one or more of the Baltic countries. Since Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are members of NATO, this could lead to a mad war between the West and Russia. Than it threatens, it is not necessary to explain.
3. North Korean Spring
This summer, a senior North Korean diplomat in London defected to South Korea. This was just the latest in a string of incidents that point to the imminent collapse of Kim Jong-un's regime. Kim fell out with powerful allies such as China. He is no longer able to provide a luxurious life for the country's elite.
Cheap smartphone technology has allowed the people of the country, for the first time in decades, to see how life is in the rest of the world. At the same time, a crisis is about to break out in the country, in comparison with which the famine of 1994 will look like a cakewalk. The result of this could be a revolution in the DPRK. People can take to the streets, the army can be divided into warring factions, and hell will begin in the country.
4. ISIS guerrilla war in Europe
Faced with airstrikes, economic upheavals, and advances by the armies of many nations, ISIS is on the brink of collapse. But don't expect terrorists to just put up with it. Most likely, the jihadists will fight directly in Europe with the help of a deadly urban guerrilla war. The big cities of Europe can turn into burial grounds, where explosions and shooting will be heard in the streets every day. In such a scenario, France and Belgium would be the first to suffer, followed by Germany and the UK.
5 Venezuelan Civil War
Lawlessness reigns in the streets of Caracas. Ordinary household goods are simply impossible to buy, inflation is over 500 percent and could soon reach 1600 percent. Civil protests, violence, corruption, police brutality and a paranoid government that refuses to see anything have become the norm in the country. The potential end result of this anarchy could be Civil War.
Since Maduro does not want to step down, hungry and angry Venezuelans may take up arms. Mass desertions from the police and the army are also possible. But even a coup may be the best course of events in Venezuela. The history of Latin America shows that such a move is likely to lead to repression and bloodshed on a horrendous scale.
6. Second Cultural Revolution in China
The Cultural Revolution under Chairman Mao was stunningly brutal. About 1.5 million people died. Millions of people were tortured and mutilated. Widespread corruption, popular discontent and a sense of betrayal have escalated into a deadly massacre.
But what happens in 2016, when China has become a developed country. China has a long history of peasant uprisings. Mao himself came to power as a result of an uprising during which 8,000,000 people died. Several decades ago, the Boxer Rebellion resulted in over 100,000 deaths.
Decades before, the Taiping Rebellion killed 20-30 million (more than 70 million according to some sources).
Now, despite all the developments, there are 500 popular protests in China every day, and about 100,000 riots break out every year. If another financial crisis breaks out suddenly, there will again be catastrophic bloodshed.
7. Bosnia #2
In the 1990s, the world watched in horror as Bosnia fell apart. Some 100,000 civilians died during the ethnic cleansing. In 1995, two "states within a state" were eventually created: Bosnia and Herzegovina for Bosniaks and Croats, and the Republika Srpska for Serbs. The trouble is that this new division is also unstable. Ethnic divisions have created a world of growing tension, bitter resentment, and a desire for revenge. Today everyone wants the best.
Youth unemployment is over 60%, the highest on Earth. Serbs and Croats still want to split up. Bosnians still want to live together. The leader of Serbia recently literally "threw a burning match into this powder keg." Ethnic Serbs will hold a referendum on whether to secede from Bosnia. As a result of this vote, the horrific civil war in Bosnia could flare up again.
8 Saudi Revolution
Saudi Arabia got off lightly during the Arab Spring. While dictators were overthrown in Tunisia and Egypt, and a real war broke out in Syria and Libya, members of the royal family in Saudi Arabia managed to hold on to power. At least until now. According to the American Washington Institute, conditions in Saudi Arabia today are similar to those that preceded the Egyptian revolution.
The nation is ready to explode. The collapse in oil prices has brought a country that is very high level expenses to the brink of bankruptcy. Youth unemployment in a country dominated by young people is out of control. Anger among educated twentysomethings just rolls over. Local ethnic minorities are rioting, and terrorists are relentlessly attacking. It is easy to imagine the revolution that will break out in connection with this discontent.
9. Indo-Pakistani nuclear war
In the winter of 2008, the world put one foot in the grave. This year, the confrontation between Pakistan and India has almost escalated into a nuclear war. In the end, the diplomats barely managed to resolve the conflict. But relations between the two countries are still very tense. If next time everything happens differently, then this could mean the end of the world. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan will put Delhi, Mumbai, Karachi and Islamabad on fire, and tens of millions will die in real hell. A nuclear winter will destroy crops across Asia, leading to massive famines. It is estimated that about two billion people will die in the process. A similar terrible conflict could be provoked by the situation in Kashmir, a region claimed by both countries.
10. South China Sea or World War III
The only thing more terrifying than a war between Pakistan and India is a war between China and the US. Especially if such countries as the Philippines, South Korea, Japan and many others are drawn into this conflict. The stumbling point could be the South China Sea, a region that is likely to provoke a third world war.
Over the past few years, China has aggressively expanded into the sea. This is mainly due to small countries that are allies of the United States. America responded with an official warning, and China responded with clear threats. If this all escalates into a war, the world will perish.
Nikita Khrushchev at the UN (was there a shoe?)
As you know, history develops in a spiral. This fully applies to the history of the United Nations. For more than half a century of its existence, the UN has undergone many changes. Created on the wave of euphoria of victory over Nazi Germany The Organization set itself bold and in many respects utopian tasks.
But time puts a lot in its place. And the hopes for creating a world without wars, poverty, hunger, lack of rights and inequality were replaced by a persistent confrontation between the two systems.
Natalia Terekhova tells about one of the most striking episodes of that time, the famous “Khrushchev’s shoe”.
REPORTAGE:
On October 12, 1960, the most stormy meeting of the General Assembly in the history of the United Nations took place. On this day the delegation Soviet Union, which was headed by Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, submitted a draft resolution on granting independence to colonial countries and peoples.
Nikita Sergeevich delivered his usual emotional speech, which abounded in exclamation marks. In his speech, Khrushchev, not sparing expressions, denounced and stigmatized colonialism and the colonialists.
After Khrushchev, the representative of the Philippines rose to the rostrum of the General Assembly. He spoke from the position of a country that experienced all the hardships of colonialism and after for long years liberation struggle achieved independence: “In our opinion, the declaration proposed by the Soviet Union should have covered and provided for the inalienable right to independence not only of the peoples and territories still under the control of the Western colonial powers, but also of the peoples of Eastern Europe and other areas deprived of the opportunity to freely exercise their civil and political rights and, so to speak, swallowed up by the Soviet Union.
Listening to the simultaneous translation, Khrushchev exploded. After consulting with Gromyko, he decided to ask the Chairman for the floor on a point of order. Nikita Sergeevich raised his hand, but no one paid any attention to him.
The famous foreign ministry translator Viktor Sukhodrev, who often accompanied Nikita Sergeevich on trips, told about what happened next in his memoirs: “Khrushchev liked to take his watch off his hand and turn it around. At the UN, he began banging his fists on the table in protest at the Filipino's speech. In his hand was a watch, which simply stopped.
And then Khrushchev angrily took off his shoe, or rather, an open wicker sandal, and began to knock on the table with his heel.
This was the moment that entered world history like the famous "Khrushchev's boot". Nothing like the hall of the UN General Assembly has not yet seen. The sensation was born right before our eyes.
And finally, the head of the Soviet delegation was given the floor:
“I protest against the unequal treatment of the representatives of the states sitting here. Why is this lackey of American imperialism coming forward? It affects the issue, it does not affect the procedural issue! And the Chairman, who sympathizes with this colonial rule, he does not stop it! Is it fair? Lord! Mr Chairman! We live on earth not by the grace of God and not by your grace, but by the strength and intelligence of our great people of the Soviet Union and all peoples who are fighting for their independence.
It must be said that in the middle of Khrushchev's speech, the simultaneous translation was interrupted, as the interpreters frantically searched for an analogue of the Russian word "kholuy". Finally, after a long pause, it was found English word"jerk", which has a wide range of meanings - from "fool" to "scum". Western reporters who covered events at the UN in those years had to work hard until they found Dictionary Russian language and did not understand the meaning of Khrushchev's metaphor.
The only remaining option for the NWO Globalist Cabal: World War III
“The global geopolitical chessboard is already secretly set for the hot phase of World War III…after the bankers conduct an early controlled demolition of the global economic and financial system.” – Intelligence Analyst and Former Military Officer
The Deep State wants war.
The shadow government wants war.
The military-industrial complex wants war.
The CFR, the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group want war.
RIIA, LBMA and SERCO want war.
The Committee of 300 and the Black Nobility want war.
Israel wants war.
Saudi Arabia wants war.
Britain and France want war.
The US intelligence community wants war.
Corporate America wants war.
The US Congress wants war.
Even the Trump administration is preparing for war.
Why do all these influential structures want war?
Because there is no other way out of their precarious situation. Only by launching a full-blown World War III scenario can they continue to exist and even flourish. Indeed, the NWO of the Globalist Cabal is now in an intolerable situation as it grows more desperate every day.
The most unsustainable aspect of their House of Cards is the ever-collapsing global economic and financial system (GE&FS). Who doesn't recognize this multi-year racket as a global casino where the casino always wins? When all the big institutional investors are forced to play the game to maintain the appearance of a fair market, it was only a matter of time before this huge pyramid scheme was exposed.
What was not fully known was that the creators of the current Global Economic and Financial System knew it would come to this. That the cracks in the pyramid would become too big to hide. Most importantly, the crushing amount of management required to maintain GE and FS just became overwhelming. Banksters can't do that anymore, and everyone knows it now.
In addition, the rapidly deteriorating state of international affairs (created by incessant false flag operations) is evidence of an ongoing and engineered clash of civilizations. The internal affairs of many countries are also in a state of constant confusion caused by a purposeful design (for example, Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Palestine, etc.).
All these apocalyptic events point to the inevitable death of the current world empire. Each one is a colossal convulsion that reflects the empire in its death throes. The current Zio-Anglo-American axis that governs this empire is being exposed for the most part. Today, the whole world is witnessing the outrageous crimes constantly perpetrated by politicians and powerful individuals in Washington DC, London and Tel Aviv. Their relentless warmongering in the Middle East was especially disastrous.
The following is a list of profound and/or serious events that mark the end of the British-American Empire. And these are just some of the major events, each of which signals the end of the era of empire.
- Iran's divorce from the US dollar and the transition to the Euro
— Israel's illegal attacks on Syria
- Occupation of Syria by US military forces and C.I.A.
— Attacks on Syrian government forces by the US-led coalition
— Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gives a fake presentation about Iran's nuclear program
— Continued incitement to war by NATO and its proxies
- False flag chemical attacks orchestrated by Western powers
- Attacks in the style of Operation Gladio are carried out all over the world
- Extreme stock market volatility, especially the NYSE
— Repatriation of gold by G20 countries
— Years of institutional downward manipulation of gold prices
— Unprecedented explosion of cryptocurrency and its extreme volatility
— Deep State intrigues and conspiracies perpetrated daily in broad daylight
- Soft coup against the President
- ZIRP and NIRP are the new normal across the G8
Escalation of the trade war between the US and China
— Inevitable Brexit and Anglo-American trade wars with the European Union
— Constant persecution of Russia and its BRICS allies
— Russia and China form close trade relations with major energy contracts
— A wave of assassinations of Russian diplomats
— Mass expulsion of Russian diplomats by 30 countries on false charges
US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley reveals herself as an Israeli stooge and warmonger
Neocon Zionist John Bolton named national security adviser
- Neocon Hawk Mike Pompeo Appointed Secretary of State
Torture lover Gina Haspel appointed CIA director
- The War Cabinet took the place of the dismissed peacekeepers
Problem of the past, dangerous future
First of all, the only way TPTB can get away from its corrupt and criminal past is by destroying all records... and erasing the memory. Even then, digital recordings will undoubtedly exist for the foreseeable future. However, the cabal is now forced to disappear with their militaristic history so that current and future generations will not find out.
The ubiquity of the Internet, which now contains so much compromising truth, has necessitated this initiative. The only one practical way for TPTB to achieve this goal - during the predictable fog of war that will inevitably prevail during World War III. For example, if martial law were to be declared in the US, then adequate cover could be provided to destroy all classified files deemed dangerous to them.
As for the future, the only way to advance their New World Order as defined by the Totalitarian One World Government is, again, World War III. Only such a destructive and global armed conflict will give them the opportunity to create enough chaos throughout the world - in the spirit of Ordo ab chao (i.e. order out of chaos) - so that they can impose the One World government the world community of nations.
Just like the first World War caused the formation of the League of Nations, and World War II became the impetus for the United Nations, World War III would be used as an excuse for the One World Government (OWG). The OWG is inherently communist in nature and features a worldwide legal system, a common language, and a single digital currency. The tyrannical OWG will be ruled by despots and dictators, where the state is worshiped as God.
Key Point: The New World Order has actually been in existence for over 100 years. Ever since the United States of America created the Federal Backup System, the NWO globalists virtually ruled the world. Even before the Fed was formed in 1913, bankster elites ruled countries, controlled societies, and controlled trade and commerce around the world for centuries.
Now they (the globalists) in 2018 have their backs against the wall.
They have nowhere else to go. They have nowhere to hide.
The Internet has been buzzing 24/7 since the end of the last century, and the buzz of curse information is only getting louder every day. An unprecedented explosion of truth about those who ruthlessly controlled the entire planetary civilization is now being reverberated around the world.
Whether the Rothschilds or the Rockefellers are being researched on the World Wide Web, the same search results show that these banksters have finally fallen into the web of their deceit and lies. What most don't know is that these two banking families are just a facade for the numerous Illuminati families that have been operating in secret ever since the Black Nobility rose to prominence after Marco Polo (i.e. since the 13th century).
As a historical fact, the real culprits of the World Wars and the Great Depression have been exposed like never before. Therefore, NWO criminals are between a rock and a hard place with no room to maneuver. So this time, nothing will save them... except, as they think, the beginning of the Third World War.
Key Point: Warmongers specifically target Iran for regime change. However, any unjustified invasion of this sovereign state is guaranteed to escalate into a regional war. Such a fire in the Middle East could easily escalate into a global conflict if the globalists launched nuclear weapons. Yes, they seem so desperate! Target Iran: Neokono Zionist plan for an apocalyptic war in the Middle East.
Of course, there is also the obsessive promotion of their NWO agenda. Only by subjugating Russia (and China) can we bring Total World Domination closer to reality. In fact, both world wars were started in order to prevent the formation of a powerful alliance between Germany and Russia. The globalists of the 20th century knew by playing Great Game that in order to achieve global hegemony, such a possibility must be prevented. For more see: STRATFOR Chapter Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plan for World Domination
Why Russia?
What the Deep State fears right now is a “partnership for peace” between the US and Russia. It feared a natural alliance between Russia and Germany, since Anglo-American dominance of the world would indeed be threatened by such a powerful geopolitical relationship. The two world wars were designed to pit Russia against Germany to prevent the formation of such a bloc. The same neo-con cabal has been very busy creating Europe for yet another World War III by manipulating the Merkel government (as well as the entire European Union) against Putin in the Kremlin. The immigrant crisis that began with the wars in the Middle East and North Africa was literally created to destabilize Europe as a precursor to World War III.
However, after the Trump presidency, the Deep State had a big "problem" - the prospect of an Entente between the United States and the Russian Federation was looming. For this reason, C.I.A. and MSM (mainstream media) began to beat the drums of war like never before. Russia has become overnight the whipping boy for everything that's wrong with the Democratic Party, as well as the scapegoat for every major (and bogus) security failure in the US. The US Intelligence Community will continue to fabricate patently false stories about the Trump administration regarding Russia as preemptive strikes to make any meaningful dialogue politically unsustainable. At the request of the CIA, the MSM will also continue to publish fake news and naked propaganda to greatly inflame anti-Russian sentiment.
Since 2017, their NWO has been under heavy attack around the world, and war has become a clear necessity. Populist movements and nationalist revolutions are springing up like mushrooms all over the planet. After the controlled destruction of the global economic and financial system, they see war - World War III - as the only real option(just like they created the Great Depression to set the stage for World War II). Incitement to extreme Russophobia has become a means to start real big wars. There is no way to avoid World War III unless Trump and Putin meet in broad daylight and declare the Deep State the sworn enemy of all peoples around the world.
Special Note: Regardless of what happens or doesn't happen in 2018, there is simply no way to stop the coming millennium crash. It can be delayed a little, but it cannot be stopped. And every day the consequences are getting deeper and more widespread.
Conclusion
Outcome: 2018 - “The year of graduation”.
The end of 2018 is doomed. The global community is facing the biggest challenge since World War II.
Those who have dictated the fate of mankind for millennia also face colossal and unforeseen obstacles. And every day their situation is only getting worse. That is why the power elite created this highly explosive situation.
My God Save America!
