Why is the center of all Russian history considered to be Kyiv and the southwestern principalities? By whose will is the no less ancient North (Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Ryazan) or the Volga region considered to be second-rate? This book shows with merciless clarity why all National history presented exclusively from pro-Western, South Slavic and Polish positions. The facts collected here are evidence
Why is Kyiv and the southwestern principalities considered to be the center of all Russian history? By whose will is the no less ancient North (Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Ryazan) or the Volga region considered to be second-rate? This book shows with merciless clarity why the entire history of our country is presented exclusively from pro-Western, South Slavic and Polish positions. The facts collected here testify that we are not talking about a coincidence of circumstances, but about the purposeful centuries-old occupation of Russia, about the total spiritual and religious dictate of the polonized public, skillfully covering up its dominance. It was its representatives, who became the main pillar of the Romanov throne, who constructed the state-religious framework, which to this day blocks the memory of our population. Various Germans and others, who had poured into the elite in abundance since the time of Peter I, only corrected the building that was not erected by them. This book will be a revelation for many, because the proposed historical perspective is too unusual.
Book " Slavic break. Ukrainian- Polish yoke in Russia» by Pyzhikov A. V. was rated by visitors to KnigoGuide and her reader rating was 0.00 out of 10.
For free viewing are provided: annotation, publication, reviews, as well as files for download.
Pereyaslav Rada. "Forever with Moscow, forever with the Russian people." Artist M. Khmelko, 1951.
Towards unity with the West
It is impossible to understand the intricacies of the medieval era without clarifying the role of Byzantium. Recall that in 1261 the crusaders were expelled from Constantinople, and the Palaiologos family came to power, founding a new dynasty. They got the throne only thanks to the support of the Genoese, who dreamed of ousting the Venetians from the region. Since then, they have ruled in the Black Sea for almost two hundred years. The incomes of emperors and Genoese from trade, collection of customs duties were distributed as one to seven, i.e. a coin to the city, and seven to Genoa.
Under such conditions, one could only dream of economic or military power. Constantinople had to focus on the spiritual or something similar, which turned into the main craft of Byzantium under the Palaiologos. The intellectual elite of this period concentrates on justifying unity with the West. The ancient world was used as a tool. With its help, they demonstrated a common origin, cultural identity Ancient Greece And ancient rome. Thus, the foundation was laid for a union with the papacy, of which the Palaiologoi were ardent adherents.
However, such historical searches caused heartburn in the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Orthodox figures did not share ancient hobbies, as contrary to the Christian spirit. At the imperial court, such critics were not favored, and therefore opposition to Latinism was ripening in the monasteries. The Athos fathers, in contrast to the promoted antiquity, relied on contemporary public entities, spread over the northern expanses, paying special attention to the Moscow principality.
The idea of the Athos party was as follows: to unite under its spiritual leadership a vast territory from southwestern Rus', Lithuania and to the eastern principalities, headed by Moscow. Of course, it is not easy to realize this, and therefore an ideal past was designed to help, when everyone was one. The historical image of a certain “All Rus'” emerged as a model of the desired future for all the peoples living here, and the role of “mother-cradle” was entrusted to Kyiv. Developing this concept, they started talking about Malaya and Great Rus': Little (Kiev) is the root of Rus', and everything else that has grown out of it is Great.
Note that the Athonite authors were not original: they simply copied the work of those who improvised with antiquity and already operated with might and main on the image of Ancient (pagan) Greece. Small (indigenous) Greece also appeared there, which then transformed into the Great. Only Orthodoxy in its Greek version was declared to be the fastening element of "all Rus'": it was it, and not the pagan heritage, that should become the banner around which it was necessary to rally. If you call a spade a spade, then Athos technologists planned, on the one hand, to profitably “nourish” vast territories, and on the other hand, to sell the combined religious asset in the person of “barbarian territories” to the same Rome in payment for supporting Byzantium in the fight against infidels. Hence the perseverance with which the metropolitans appointed by Constantinople carried out the religious rallying of "all Rus'".
According to the laws of commerce
Among the people of the 15th-16th centuries, there was no division into the political and religious spheres. The very word "politics" came into use only on the eve of the eighteenth century. The role of the tool in achieving political, in fact, tasks was performed by the church. The strengthening of the Lithuanian-Polish "clan" directly depended on strong positions in the church sphere.
The alpha and omega of the pro-Romanov scholars (Karamzin, Ustryalov, Pogodin) is that the Polish-Ukrainian cadres were dissolved in a social environment that was religiously one with them. They cannot admit that the church of Muscovy and the church in Lithuania and Ukraine are two big differences.
Our church, in contrast to the Uniate, tried to adhere to two unshakable principles. The first one is that the church cannot be a business structure, which means it cannot conduct commercial and property transactions. The second is that given the multinational structure of the country, it must be adapted to other beliefs. This made it possible to maintain a balanced relationship with the same widespread Islam. It was for such religiosity that the great holy ascetic Sergius of Radonezh stood up. But such a church atmosphere was alien to Lithuania and Ukraine with its Catholic trends. A church that was not immersed in commerce was considered second-rate there, and loyalty to Muslims was perceived as something beyond.
Instead of Zemsky Sobors
On January 8, 1654, the Pereyaslav Treaty was signed on the accession of Ukraine to Russia. For the Ukrainian-Polish immigrants who rallied around the Romanovs, this was an epoch-making event. There was an opportunity to finally explain to everyone and everyone why they are hosting here. If earlier state legitimation, including Mikhail Fedorovich, relied on Zemsky Sobors, which were considered a natural source of power, now Little Russia is replacing this institution.
It is no coincidence that since its accession in 1654, the practice of convening zemstvo councils has ceased. They are no longer needed, since Romanov's power was declared a continuation of the true principles personified by Ukraine, which outweighs the representation of lands clouded with Tatar impurities; the center of gravity of state building shifted. Therefore, the possession of Ukraine pursued not so much economic goals, as is traditionally believed, but extremely important ideological meanings. Since that time, the war with Poland has turned, by and large, into a struggle for Ukraine.
Reform beneficiaries
At the so-called Great Council of 1666-1667, convened on the initiative of Alexei Mikhailovich, the irreversibility of church reforms was confirmed. For the appropriate weight, the eastern patriarchs were invited to it: in Moscow they counted on the arrival of Constantinople and Jerusalem. But they avoided the visit, and had to be content with little - the Patriarch of Alexandria and the same Patriarch of Antioch. The Greek representatives were given emphatically decisive importance. They provided invaluable assistance to Aleksey and his Ukrainian team in discrediting the Old Rite.
The spread of the latter was associated with the separation from Constantinople, conquered by the Turks, after which there was a transition to two-fingered. The thought was carried out: once upon a time (in bright times Kievan Rus) Moscow was quite correct, but then a “dark obscuration” occurred, and only now, under Alexei Mikhailovich, Orthodoxy triumphs. It is easy to guess that the reverse side of such a concept should be the recognition of the former church heretical.
Our church was forcibly driven into a new religious format: from anathematizing the old rites to requiring priests to dress in Greek style. All this made such a heavy impression that even the Romanov historians stated the tactlessness of what was happening. In an effort to minimize the negative, they emphasized that excessive severity could only be the work of someone else's hands, i.e. the Greeks who ran the cathedral. Thus, Ukrainian church leaders were removed from criticism, who, as it were, found themselves in the shadows.
Do not reproach change
Peter's addiction to foreignness has never been a secret, at the same time, much less is known about his deep attachment to Little Russia, which is almost completely obscured by the European theme. The increase in the share of foreigners in the elite changed a lot, but did not at all erode the Ukrainian-Polish spirit.
Peter in every possible way supported the status of Ukraine as a special, privileged territory within Russia, spent a lot of money on its arrangement. At the expense of the treasury, he erected several fortresses there, bought weapons for the local army, and freed him from extortions. The first of the Romanovs to visit Kyiv, where he remained almost the entire summer of 1706. However, the successes of the army of Charles XII, who defeated Saxony, Poland and raided Ukraine, pushed Mazepa to an anti-Russian alliance. But even outright betrayal did not affect the reverent attitude towards the Ukrainian "brothers", in which Peter followed in the footsteps of his father Alexei Mikhailovich. The Manifesto of March 11, 1710, strictly forbade the Great Russian people "to insult the Little Russians, to reproach them with the betrayal of Mazepa", the guilty were threatened with severe punishment and even the death penalty for daring insults.
Strange "Russian party"
The reign of Peter I is fateful not only in terms of socio-economic transformations, but also in terms of the formation of the Russian ruling stratum. The first quarter of the 18th century captures its final features. It was then that the formation of two parties in the elites was completed: foreign and "Russian", as historians of the Romanov school call them.
visiting foreigners, in large numbers launched by Peter, began to claim a significant role in the use of the treasury, in squeezing the juice out of the population. This circumstance was noted by everyone who has ever got acquainted with the domestic past. However, something else is still surprising: the struggle at the top of Russia is seen in the context of the so-called foreign and "Russian" parties.
If everything is very clear regarding the first, then one can speak about the “Russian” with a big stretch. This is a serious omission of historiography, which did not want to realize that the Ukrainian-Polish party was actually disguised as “Russian”. Who are the Russians in it really? Is it not Feofan Prokopovich with Stefan Yavorsky and a whole scattering of their kind who completed the destruction of our church? In general, the “Russian” representatives at the top were distinguished by an open disdain for everything Russian in the Moscow sense of the word, and in this hatred they completely merged with the foreign party.
Love and friendship
Alexander I was known as a passionate Polonophile. Maria Chetvertinskaya was his long-term mistress, and bosom friends - Czartorysky, Kochubey, Zavadovsky, Razumovsky, Troshchinsky occupied leading ministerial posts, patronizing their relatives. Emperor's younger brother Grand Duke Konstantin Pavlovich, who became the governor of the Kingdom of Poland, married Grudzinskaya, adoring everything Polish with her. Alexander I himself liked to walk around in a Polish military uniform.
Let's agree, a rather strange behavior for the "occupiers": for example, the British elite, having turned India into a colony, did not flaunt around London in Indian attire, and the Indians were not appointed to the British government. Why did this happen in Russia? Yes, because the same relatives were present in St. Petersburg and Poland. This is confirmed by the fact that after the war of 1812, the Poles who fought on the side of Napoleon were gladly enrolled in Russian army to officer positions.
Under Nicholas I, Kyiv was practically built: then the “mother of Russian cities” acquired modern features. Nicholas I personally approved an extensive urban development plan, projects of streets, bridges, having visited Kyiv fifteen times during his reign. No ruler Russian Empire or Soviet Union haven't been there that often.
To realize the scale of the Ukrainian-Polish-German governance of Russia is hindered by the propaganda stamp about the “Russianness” of the elite. Many representatives of the Ukrainian-Polish-German stratum appeared under Russian surnames: today this confuses even those who study our history. The commonality between those bearing Russian and Ukrainian-Polish-German surnames is that the family estates of this nobility (66.2% of the total number of estates) were located in Little Russia and Lithuania, including the Baltic states. The landed estates granted to them in vast Russia were added to their family nests.
White Little Russians
1917 - the collapse of the empire led to the elimination of the former ruling stratum. If you look at who tried to strangle the Soviet republic, then the Ukrainian-Polish-German trail clearly manifested itself. We need to remember the leaders white movement which, we are assured, has absorbed true patriots Russia.
Ancestors A.V. Kolchak by his father - from the landowners of the Kherson province, in 1843 they received hereditary nobility. The father of the future "supreme ruler" served in the Maritime Department, the mother came from a merchant family, her parent was a member of the Odessa City Duma. Kolchak is married to a noblewoman S. Kamenskaya from the Podolsk province; full-fledged Ukrainian family. P.N. Wrangel descended from the house of Tolsburg-Ellistfer, the wife of the general was the lady-in-waiting of the Imperial Court O. Ivanenko; their family nests were in Ukraine. N.N. Yudenich - from the Little Russian nobles of the Minsk province; German ancestors of E.K. Miller (commander in civil war Northern Front) settled in Vitebsk province; General A.G. Shkuro is a descendant of the Zaporozhye Cossacks. From the Poltava landowners M.G. Drozdovsky. IN. Kappel comes from a noble family of the Kovno province: by his mother he is Postolsky ...
People's prison?
However, it was not destined to keep the state on the new anti-Ukrainian platform. To a large extent, this happened because humanities 1920s, headed by M.N. Pokrovsky, could not comprehend the historical path of Russia and ideologically substantiate the new foundation of the state. Pathological enthusiasm for economic schemes, class struggle, as a tribute to Marxist dogma, did not allow us to understand the fatefulness of the Ukrainian topic. The Ukrainian-Polish element in the image of Pokrovsky appeared to be the same victims of the “Russian oppression”, like all other nationalities!
All the curses were addressed to the Russians, who were exposed as overseers, the administration of the prison of peoples, called Russia. In addition, the Marxist school of Pokrovsky could not, by and large, oppose anything to the Romanov concept of history. The old professorial cadres attracted by Stalin did everything to rehabilitate the pre-revolutionary attitudes. Therefore, those forces that have been humiliating and plundering our country for centuries have successfully managed to maintain their reputation, which means a chance to return as masters.
These encroachments, which were not long in coming, are associated with the name of N.S. Khrushchev. And with the coming to power of his nominee L.I. Brezhnev, the nomenklatura tops of the USSR were at the mercy of the Ukrainian element. It is enough to look at the composition of the Central Committee elected by the 25th or 26th Party Congress: secretaries of regional committees (regardless of geography), ministers, senior officials of the apparatus of the Central Committee and the government. Probably, there has not been such a large number of Ukrainian personnel in the country since the end of the 17th - the first half of the 18th century, when they appeared in our lands on the wave of church reform...
This topic was voiced by me in the video:
On June 16, 2017, the Conceptual TV channel posted a video presentation of Dr. historical sciences Alexandra Pyzhikova, which will be released under the heading "Slavic fault. Ukrainian-Polish yoke in Russia".
As expected, the speech of the historian caused a lively response from YouTube viewers. I suggest that you familiarize yourself with some of them and decide for yourself whether it is worth listening to Alexander Pyzhikov's speech. My opinion is definitely worth it.
So here are the comments below the video:
Alexander, you respect and honor for the words of truth! You reveal the age-old concepts of lies about Christianity and Byzantium imposed on us about Rus' ... unfortunately, the corruption and meanness of Byzantium was accepted by Muscovy as the concept of a new world ... which still dominates in modern Russia with her ROC. A lie of the same universal scale as the so-called Universal Church itself.
If you listen to you, then at least close the church. Nyasha is not on you!
Many thanks to A. Pyzhikov! Finally, at least one courageous and decent person began to pull the truth out. And the publishing house "Conceptual" too Thanks a lot for courage and decency, well done! That's why these crazy raguli with pshonki, and all this former Commonwealth all the time yelling about damned Muscovites, but we just can't understand why they stuck to us. :))
Thank you, very interesting indeed. that Byzantium, in the "face of the workers" of Athos, as seen from Moldova, renews the idea of the "Trojan horse". Dear Russians, some rather immoral subject from the Republic of Moldova, remember. Igor Caldare, after that. how "happily" he managed at the information level to ensure that anti-Russian political forces came to power in Moldova together with NATO structures, suddenly disappeared from the political field of the Republic of Moldova and showed up in Athos, today on FB he "posts pictures from the Solovetsky Islands, continuing elementarily "spoil" the cooperation established at the official level between Moscow and Chisinau.Do not disregard this emerging environmental factor.
- "We sing a song to the madness of the faithful." Dedicated to all true orthodox Christians of the Greek Rite Church (ROC). Very similar to the truth, the division of influence and power on the fragments of the empire .... Hence all the chronicles written by the monks ... with a specific purpose ... which are now being read historical documents ....
But it's true - they drove it into our heads about the heirs of Byzantium, as if our ancestors lived in trees during the time of Byzantium. What the hell is someone else's muddy legacy, which, moreover, was imposed on us?
What the hell is this historian doing? The Catholic West, which has become the elder brother of the Orthodox East, forgot to mention that the "elder brother" has the oldest - the Jews. Apparently in politics is served? Hatred of Orthodoxy comes through in words. Talked? Or is it a line?
I googled around here and found out a lot. It turns out that ecumenism has been there for a long time, many years ago, and this applies to all Abrahamic religions - the New Age project is called. They just kept it hidden from the people. ((This is according to the occult philosophy of the religious philosopher S.M. Solovyov (who still lived before the revolution, calling himself a Russian philosopher). In fact, as Pyzhikov says, he is from Ukraine, apparently from the west, some relative of his crest Skovoroda. But according to his photograph, this is a natural Jew, and he was very concerned about issues of anti-Semitism and Orthodoxy, as well as Catholicism, and Muslims were also dragged out with Buddhists. ... ((So, there, in his "works", such nonsense of a mentally ill person written that I already became ill from reading - the creation of chaos, a return to the Middle Ages, to Western Europe an influx of foreign barbarians, blah, blah, blah, ... just read this is his crazy project, and all this so that later all peoples will suffer and then after .... Pure occultism, ecumenism, idiocy, with elements of bondage. ..!
The whole horror is that this nonsense of a madman is being realized, they really shed the blood of people (Yugoslavia, Ukraine, ...)! Moreover, there even the Old Believers are already in cahoots with them! But not ordinary members of the community, of course, they themselves are in shock, but many of their metropolitans!!! These philosophers were idle occultists, including Blavatsky, Rozanov. And Bulgakov also hung around with them. ("Master and Margarita" wrote just). In our time, Men and Sysoev already participated in the project - they have already been killed, and some kind of Muslim Murza is participating there. And all this for the sake of power, enslavement and of course money! They just have banking capitalism at an impasse, and instead of Jews, England has now adapted the Mormons, so they rushed about - this usurious mafia!
The video itself is here, with the following annotation:
Unraveling the tangle of world history, Alexander Pyzhikov, Doctor of Historical Sciences, comes to unexpected conclusions related to the unprecedented influence of the Byzantine church hierarchs on the political processes that took place at the turn of the 13th-14th centuries. in Rus'.
From this video you will learn how the religious political technologists of Constantinople implemented the external control of Russia, where and on what basis the confrontation between the Kievan and Moscow principalities arose, what role did Prince Dmitry Donskoy, Metropolitan Cyprian, Patriarch Philotheus and Lithuanian Prince Vitovt play in this.
Why is Kyiv and the southwestern principalities considered to be the center of all Russian history? By whose will is the no less ancient North (Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Ryazan) or the Volga region considered to be second-rate? This book shows with merciless clarity why the entire history of our country is presented exclusively from pro-Western, South Slavic and Polish positions. The facts collected here testify that we are not talking about a coincidence of circumstances, but about the purposeful centuries-old occupation of Russia, about the total spiritual and religious dictate of the polonized public, skillfully covering up its dominance. It was its representatives, who became the main pillar of the Romanov throne, who constructed the state-religious framework, which to this day blocks the memory of our population. Various Germans and others, who had poured into the elite in abundance since the time of Peter I, only corrected the building that was not erected by them. This book will be a revelation for many, because the proposed historical perspective is too unusual.
Quotes from the book
Fighting Pagan Faith
We should not forget the attempts of the Germans in the XII-XIII centuries to gain a foothold under the auspices of Christianity in pagan Lithuania. According to the description of the same Romanov historians, there was already a fierce struggle with the indigenous population. Stories about the aggression of the papacy, about the local peoples pretending to be baptized, about uprisings against Catholic orders are a favorite topic of Klyuchevsky, Solovyov and others. But when it comes to southwestern colonization in the central part of modern Russia, then a blissful picture is presented.
Geopolitical construct
If you call a spade a spade, then Athos technologists planned, on the one hand, to profitably “nourish” vast territories, and on the other hand, to sell the united religious asset in the person of “barbarian territories” to the same Rome in payment for supporting Byzantium in the fight against infidels. Hence the perseverance with which the metropolitans appointed by Constantinople carried out the religious unification of "all Rus'.
"Trojan horse" in power
The tools of the Time of Troubles should be supplemented with another factor that will help to comprehend the realities of that time. The concept of the fifth column was previously absolutely unacceptable, since it sharply contradicted the historiographical concept. Who did it consist of, what interests connected it with the Poles? - such questions could not even be posed within the framework of the scheme established since the time of the New Chronicler. On the existence in the Moscow elites from the time Basil III the pro-Polish group, the backbone of which consisted of Lithuanian-Ukrainian immigrants, tried not to mention at all. The power claims of the latter were crossed out by the oprichnina, after which four decades of vegetation in the backyards of power followed. It was not possible to regain the lost positions on our own, not to mention more.
Split directors
Our church was forcibly driven into a new religious format: from anathematizing the old rites to requiring priests to dress in Greek style. All this made such a heavy, depressing impression that even Romanov historians stated the tactlessness of what was happening. In an effort to minimize the negative, they emphasized that excessive severity could only be the work of the wrong hands, that is, the Greeks who ran the cathedral. Thus, Ukrainian church leaders were removed from criticism, who, as it were, found themselves in the shadows.
Window to Europe: Overton Window in action
Since Peter I, the alienation of the Romanov elite from the population only increased, which was facilitated by a rapid influx of foreigners. If during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich these processes were only gaining momentum, then under Peter they unfolded in full force. Love for everything foreign distinguished the sovereign literally from the cradle.
Architects of the White movement in Russia
KGB against Ukrainian group
Monarchist project in our time
Today, the same forces, having recovered from the Soviet blow, having torn apart the USSR from within, are eager to resume their dominance, calling for a return to the "root", that is, to the same state-church omnipotence. Before our very eyes, the monarchical-Orthodox mechanisms that were tested under the Romanovs are being reproduced again. And this cannot be put to an end as long as national history is under their vigilant control.
Why is Kyiv and the southwestern principalities considered to be the center of all Russian history? By whose will is the no less ancient North (Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk, Ryazan) or the Volga region considered to be second-rate? This book shows with merciless clarity why the entire history of our country is presented exclusively from pro-Western, South Slavic and Polish positions. The facts collected here testify that we are not talking about a coincidence of circumstances, but about the purposeful centuries-old occupation of Russia, about the total spiritual and religious dictate of the polonized public, skillfully covering up its dominance. It was its representatives, who became the main pillar of the Romanov throne, who constructed the state-religious framework, which to this day blocks the memory of our population. Various Germans and others, who had poured into the elite in abundance since the time of Peter I, only corrected the building that was not erected by them. This book will be a revelation for many, because the proposed historical perspective is too unusual.
