Homo erectus roams among. A Brief Review of Richard Foerle's Erectus Walks Between Us. Archaic Man and Modern Man

Richard D. Ferle

Erectus roams between us. Conquest of the white race

« erectus Walks Among Us. The evolution of modern humans" by Richard D. Fuerle

Vladimir Avdeev

The Conspiracy Anthropology of Richard Ferlet

"Anthropology is one of those rare sciences that only a few professors can privatize."

Fritz Lenz, German racial theorist

"If my theory does not agree with the facts, then so much the worse for the facts."

G.W.F. Hegel

Contrary to public opinion widely disseminated by mass media, V modern science there is no single stable idea about the origin of the human race. New discoveries in genetics and paleontology seem to raise more questions than they answer. Representatives of modern anthropological science, interpreting the secrets of our origin, are entangled in the principles of guild solidarity, like a medieval corporation of alchemists, and belonging to one camp or another can cost a person, if not life, as in the days of Giordano Bruno, then, in any case, reputation and social status . The right to own the history of the human race is a truly invaluable information resource, which is why the battles around it in the academic environment do not subside. Science today is a matter of great finance and prestige, and every political regime is doing its best to improve its image by patronizing scientists and giving the impression of general concern with theoretical problems that are actually controlled by only a few people. Those who own the past of mankind will be able to take possession of its future, so you need to have great courage to challenge the big businessmen from science, including in this most important area.

Among such restless and "uncomfortable" truth-seekers is the modern American scientist Richard Furle Richard Fuerle author of the book "Erectus wanders between us", which made a splash in the West. This fundamental work on almost the entire set of modern data affecting the problem of the evolution of man and his races fully reflects the severity of discussions in the scientific community, as well as the degree of interest of biased circles of politicians, jurists and representatives of the mass media.

Richard Ferlet is a classic example of a "free thinker". And if in the modern Russian understanding this definition has rather a negative meaning, implying dilettantism and "knowing" of an amateur philosopher, then the situation is completely different in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, where a free thinker is first of all a professional high level who personally bears the burden of economic and social responsibility for the fruits of his intellectual activity. This is a man of mental labor, he pays for everything according to the bills, reports only to his conscience, the canons of science and is not subject to the whiffs of the political situation.

Richard Ferle does not live in an “ivory tower”, but on a small island near New York, surrounded by pristine nature, and, despite his mature age, calls himself an eternal student, as he combines a relentless craving for self-improvement with training in prestigious educational institutions. He holds a bachelor's degree in mathematics, physics, chemistry, a master's degree in economics, and a doctorate in law. It is this wide range of knowledge that allowed Ferlet to work for a long time as a patent examiner, and, like no one else, he knows how insidious and sometimes illusory the boundary separating science and jurisprudence, without which the functioning modern society today is simply unthinkable. Behind long years career, having seen enough of the intrigues and machinations that are happening at this “border crossing”, as befits a true free thinker, he decided to independently analyze the key problem of the evolution of mankind and its races, clearly showing that there is a place for smuggling in science. Thus was born his book, which has already been reprinted several times.

However, Richard Ferle's talents are not limited to this, for he is an amateur composer, as well as the author of monographs on the Austrian economy, natural law and the theory of anarchism.

Fully aware of the scale of the task, the scientist begins the preface with philosophical discussions about the system of values in science, emphasizing that the so-called "pure science" is a myth. The main problem is the dialogue between representatives of polar opposite views on the theory of evolution of human races. According to the author, the generalization of these data is "exciting material", since "fraud in anthropology has become the norm." The times of free disputes have long since sunk into oblivion, and the entire Western world is literally entangled in the snares of the "equality police", spreading everywhere the norms of egalitarianism, comparable to the bacilli of the "intellectual plague".

The main conspiracy secret of the origin of the human races, according to Ferlet, is that there really is no secret, but there is a secret of the origin of those who create this secret with enviable regularity. As the need to figure out who needs it and benefits, the author formulates the task of his work with the typical meticulousness of a patent expert. Ferlet skillfully builds a logical chain based on the basic data of archeology, genetics, the general theory of evolution, the evolutionary theory of sex, psychology, leading us to the conclusion that the emergence of human races is due to the entire course of the organic development of nature: “The races arose before the appearance of erectus, from the time of Australopithecus that is, the appearance of races preceded the appearance of the genus Homo. From the standpoint of Darwin's general theory of evolution, "the frequency of specific traits that provide greater reproductive success will increase in populations."

Thus, the increase in the concentration of racial traits and, as a consequence of the evolutionary isolation of races, is a natural path for the organic development of nature. Biological differences are the main driver in the struggle for the survival of species - this is the root of Darwin's theory. “In other words, genetic equality, egalitarianism makes evolution impossible. Without the ability to evolve species can only die out with changes in the habitat that occur with inevitability.

The ecological niche in which a race develops inevitably shapes its specialization. On the basis of data from archeology, cultural history, genetics and the theory of behavior, Ferlet illustrates the correctness of his arguments, which confirm general theory evolution. Natural selection created traits and fixed them hereditarily, which contributed to the development of races.

These natural scientific conclusions lead to the fact that the theory of the origin of modern humans from Africa is untenable and openly politically biased, since “the genetic differences between Africans and Europeans are so pronounced that the proportion of European admixture in Africans can be determined at an error level of only 0 .02".

Current page: 1 (total book has 34 pages) [accessible reading excerpt: 23 pages]

Richard D. Ferle
Erectus roams between us. Conquest of the white race

« erectus Walks Among Us. The evolution of modern humans" by Richard D. Fuerle

Vladimir Avdeev
The Conspiracy Anthropology of Richard Ferlet

"Anthropology is one of those rare sciences that only a few professors can privatize."

Fritz Lenz, German racial theorist

"If my theory does not agree with the facts, then so much the worse for the facts."

G.W.F. Hegel

Contrary to public opinion, widely disseminated by the media, in modern science there is no single stable idea about the origin of the human race. New discoveries in genetics and paleontology seem to raise more questions than they answer. Representatives of modern anthropological science, interpreting the secrets of our origin, are entangled in the principles of guild solidarity, like a medieval corporation of alchemists, and belonging to one camp or another can cost a person, if not life, as in the days of Giordano Bruno, then, in any case, reputation and social status . The right to own the history of the human race is a truly invaluable information resource, which is why the battles around it in the academic environment do not subside. Science today is a matter of great finance and prestige, and every political regime is doing its best to improve its image by patronizing scientists and giving the impression of general concern with theoretical problems that are actually controlled by only a few people. Those who own the past of mankind will be able to take possession of its future, so you need to have great courage to challenge the big businessmen from science, including in this most important area.

Richard Ferlet is a classic example of a "free thinker". And if in the modern Russian understanding this definition has rather a negative meaning, implying dilettantism and "knowing" of an amateur philosopher, then the situation is completely different in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, where a free thinker is primarily a high-level professional who personally bears the burden of economic and social responsibility for fruits of their intellectual activity. This is a man of mental labor, he pays for everything according to the bills, reports only to his conscience, the canons of science and is not subject to the whiffs of the political situation.

Richard Ferle does not live in an “ivory tower”, but on a small island near New York, surrounded by pristine nature, and, despite his mature age, calls himself an eternal student, as he combines a relentless craving for self-improvement with studying at prestigious educational institutions . He holds a bachelor's degree in mathematics, physics, chemistry, a master's degree in economics, and a doctorate in law. It is this wide range of knowledge that allowed Ferlet to work as a patent examiner for a long time, and, like no one else, he knows how insidious and sometimes illusory the boundary separating science and jurisprudence, without which the functioning of modern society today is simply unthinkable. Over the long years of his career, having seen enough of the intrigues and machinations that are happening at this “border crossing”, as befits a true free thinker, he decided to independently analyze the key problem of the evolution of mankind and its races, clearly showing that there is a place for smuggling in science. Thus was born his book, which has already been reprinted several times.

However, Richard Ferle's talents are not limited to this, for he is an amateur composer, as well as the author of monographs on the Austrian economy, natural law and the theory of anarchism.

Thus, the increase in the concentration of racial traits and, as a consequence of the evolutionary isolation of races, is a natural path for the organic development of nature. Biological differences are the main driver in the struggle for the survival of species - this is the root of Darwin's theory. “In other words, genetic equality, egalitarianism makes evolution impossible. And without the ability to evolve, biological species can only die out with changes in the habitat that inevitably occur.

The ecological niche in which a race develops inevitably shapes its specialization. On the basis of data from archeology, cultural history, genetics and the theory of behavior, Ferlet illustrates the correctness of his arguments, which confirm the general theory of evolution. Natural selection created traits and fixed them hereditarily, which contributed to the development of races.

Ferlet considers and systematizes in great detail the main differences between races at the morphological and then genetic level, clearly demonstrating the degree of remoteness of the main racial trunks from each other and the level of specialization of representatives of modern races. The morphological development of the brain is directly related to the IQ, which, in turn, determines the specifics of human behavior and its civilizational abilities. Altruistic tendencies, criminal tendencies, and sexual behavior patterns are also functional outcomes of brain development. The specificity of sexual-marital relations clearly indicates where it is necessary to look for the centers of the emergence of races. "Pair formation was important step on the path to humanization, and since it is less characteristic of Africans, this trait did not originate in Africa, and the population that embarked on the path of humanization was not African. If we talk about the donation of money, blood or human organs, then Europeans are much more generous than representatives of other races, and they show this generosity regardless of whether the person in need is their relative or not. Therefore, these fatal racial-evolutionary differences cannot be eliminated with the help of social philanthropy. “Trillions of dollars are being spent on programs aimed at closing the gap in academic achievement between whites and blacks. All these programs have failed. Geneticists identify the genes responsible for intelligence and estimate the prevalence of these genes around the world. Not surprisingly, the prevalence of such genes in Africa is much lower than in Europe or Asia. It is hard to argue that blacks are incapable of achievement because of poor education or because of racist attitudes on the part of whites if they do not have the genes necessary for learning.

Between the evolutionary morphology of the body in representatives of various races and their abilities for culture, a direct and obvious connection is thus revealed: “The primitive features include larger muscles, more developed aromatic glands, a smaller brain with less pronounced convolutions, a smaller anteroposterior and smaller frontal lobes. Less protruding nasal bones are also a primitive trait, as early hominids lacked external nasal bones; the African nose is very flat. Practically all racial differences between Africans and natives of Eurasia lie in the area of primitive traits, and if Africans generally have signs of a more perfect development than the inhabitants of Eurasia, then they are extremely few. The evidence shows a very large number of differences in bone tissue, soft tissue, physiology, behavior, intelligence, cultural achievements and genes. And, most importantly, all available data are consistent with each other. It does not happen that the genes testify to the development of blacks, and the bones testify to their primitiveness. All evidence suggests one thing: they are primitive, less evolved and closer to our anthropoid ancestors.”

With the help of these facts, gleaned from classical works on evolutionary anthropology, the author brings readers to the main thesis of his book: the modern politically tolerant concept of the origin of all human races from Africa does not stand up to criticism, because it is intensively implanted in the public consciousness by purely political methods, being in an obvious contradictions with the principles of objective science.

And this is where, in our opinion, the most interesting begins, which has led to such a massive popularity of the American scientist today, since Richard Ferlet can be presented as one of the heralds of a whole trend, which it would be appropriate to call conspiracy anthropology. For in no other way than with the help of conspiracy theory, it is impossible to explain the persistence of liberal circles, with which they are pushing the concept of the African origin of mankind to the surface of public consciousness with all their might. It should be emphasized that the term "conspiracy anthropology" is first introduced into use by the author of these lines, although the very tendency of political falsification of the history of mankind can be traced back to medieval church hierarchs. These facts of falsification are widely publicized, but attempts to appropriate the genealogical tree of mankind continue to this day, so it is extremely important to consider the methodology of modern encroachments on freedom of discussion, which is the basic principle of the existence of science. And although the days of the fires of the Inquisition have passed, the methods of modern tradition of ostracizing the authority of a scientist are still very effective. In this regard, Richard Ferlet's Erectus Walks Between Us is a very valuable tool for maintaining an atmosphere of sanity in modern society, being a kind of guide to the labyrinths of modern conspiracy anthropology. And the invaluable experience of the American scientist will serve as a kind of Ariadne's thread in this matter.

Criticizing the aforementioned fashionable hypothesis, the author rightly asks the following questions: “If a modern type of man existed in Africa 160,000 years ago, then why are today's Africans so primitive in all respects? Haven't Africans reverse-evolved from more advanced ancestors, becoming more primitive? Another question that springs to mind is why tropical-adapted Africans left Africa 65,000 years ago, right in the middle of the first ice age (which lasted approximately 73,000 to 55,000 years ago), when more cold-adapted Eurasian hominins moved south? And the last question: why did African erectus become sapiens, and not Asian or European ones, especially in light of the fact that the habitat in Eurasia was more selective for modern traits, and turning into Homo sapiens would give a greater advantage?

The author rightly draws attention to the fact that one of the key principles of biology is the multiregional theory of the origin of species, and asks the question, why should this rule be discarded, as Afrocentrists do when considering the origin of the human race? Such questions arise in any unbiased researcher by themselves.

Ferlet emphasizes that fundamental morphological differences in the structure of the skull and skeleton in fossil ancestors from different parts of the world arose much earlier than this supposed settlement took place. In addition, the age of these morphophysiological differences is estimated at hundreds of thousands of years and even millions. That is, on the face of a chronological inconsistency and logical inconsistencies in the concept of Afrocentrists.

Even worse, from the point of view of elementary logic, things are with this theory when we begin to analyze its chronological aspects in geographical space. “How is it possible that allegedly modern Africans could not even reach the islands off the African coast just a few thousand years ago? That the islands, even visible from Africa, have not been explored and inhabited certainly suggests that Africans were not yet developed even very recently, so it is simply ridiculous to believe that they were developed when they allegedly migrated from Africa 65,000 years back. How could modern Africans supposedly not only leave Africa and make their way through Europe and Asia, but even get to Australia and the islands Pacific Ocean never reaching the islands very close to its coast? - the American scientist rightly asks.

As is known, the breeding of domestic animals and the selective cultivation of valuable plant varieties are indispensable attributes of any phase of development. human society. In the same way, traces of vital activity at the sites of mass migrations, scattered over the surface of the Earth, should clearly indicate the direction of movement of masses of people. But in the most striking way, it turns out that nothing of the kind has been found in Africa - the supposed cradle of mankind. One gets the impression that the progenitors of modern races simultaneously scattered over all even the most remote regions of the land from one place, leaving no traces of their temporary stay anywhere, and in the process of this magical levitation, they changed the whole complex of racial characteristics, consisting of thousands of parameters, at once and in a very diverse way, after This created completely different and dissimilar types of civilization.

Modern methods of science only exacerbate the overall picture of absurdity in the Afrocentric concept. Differences in mitochondrial DNA between Europeans, Africans and Asians arose much earlier than in the exodus from Africa. To cover this obvious mathematical casuistry, the creators of the concept even had to invent some fantastic zoological creature like a fictional character in a children's cartoon for the needs of a bored public.

"Mitochondrial Eve" - this is the metaphysical name given by the Afrocentrists to our "grandmother", who they believe lived in Africa about 150,000 years ago, from whom all living people got their mitochondrial DNA. "This" Eva "was not the only woman, since a viable population must include at least a thousand married couples. According to Afrocentric ideas, all women in this population either had the same mitochondrial DNA, or, having a different mitochondrial DNA, did not have daughters.

It seems that this is already reminiscent of the tricks of card sharpers with the substitution of cards within the same suit, when a jack suddenly turns out of a six. But the wonders of the amusing "concept" do not end there, for in the framework of the modern tradition, Afrocentrists argue that the human genealogical tree, built on a computer, clearly points to the African ancestral home. And since this is calculated on a computer, then this is the ultimate truth. But Richard Ferle, himself a certified mathematician, shows that this family tree can just as well be derived from the Martians, since a computer is just a technical device that performs someone else's will according to a given program, nothing more. And it is not his fault that the will of the Afrocentrists opposes all the laws of mathematical logic. " family tree theory of the "Exodus from Africa" is not the simplest tree. In fact, there are over a billion such evolutionary trees. For these reasons, until technical problems are overcome, mitochondrial DNA will not be able to answer questions about either Eve's habitat or her age. If computer-generated genealogies by Afrocentrists don't prove that Eve lived in Africa, and don't even provide a reliable answer to the question of when she lived, is it possible to use mitochondrial DNA data in some other way to find out where she lived?

The American scientist also gives an impressive list of genes responsible for the morphological structure of the brain, which are present in Europeans and are completely absent in people from the African continent. This fact also confirms the impossibility of the origin of modern races from this region. Afrocentrists do not disdain frank falsification of the principles of taxonomy, resorting to the practice of double standards. The cumulative genetic distances for human races are several times greater than those for animal breeds, but at the same time, Afrocentrists argue that the human races belong to the same species, and the animal breeds mentioned belong to different ones. Where is the logic and universality of the principles of classification for all organisms in nature?

Further, the author of the book rightly draws attention to the fact that genes are grouped into gene complexes, which in turn determine racial characteristics, therefore, between the main branches of humanity, these are not only differences in gene frequencies, but also in recombinations of gene complexes, and at this level racial differences are even clearer and more tangible: “Thus, the genes responsible for light skin and hair color could not have had an initial foothold in Africa, but only in a population that lived in Eurasia and lived there long enough for all existing genes encoding light skin and hair color.

In recent decades, studies of the nuclear DNA of human populations have become widespread, and here the situation for fans of the Exodus from Africa theory is even more deplorable. “In fact, there is no plausible model for the transformation of African nuclear DNA into Caucasian and Mongoloid nuclear DNA, and there is no evidence that the population of Eurasia ever possessed any genes specific to Africans. For example, Caucasoid and Mongoloid skulls do not have features characteristic of African skulls, and traces of African-specific genes, such as curly hair, are not found in modern inhabitants of Eurasia, whose ancestors did not mix with Africans,” notes Richard Ferle.

Differences in genetic structure most directly affect the intelligence of populations and the specifics of their evolutionary struggle for existence. “It would take much more than 65,000 years to replace the population of Eurasia with people from Africa. Assuming they have characteristics that Africans had 65,000 years ago, it is highly implausible that they had preeminence in foraging on continents with which they were unfamiliar, even if the inhabitants of Eurasia were more primitive. In addition, it is very unlikely that the Eurasians welcomed the Africans with open arms on their territory, thus a gradual peaceful replacement was not possible.

It would seem that any sane person, even without special knowledge in evolutionary anthropology, would have enough common sense to reject the hypothesis of the origin of modern human races from Africa. But Afrocentrists are very, very stubborn, so their system of evidence gives the external impression of an obsessive psychopathic destructive mania. In this regard, Richard Ferle rightly sums up: “Even Afrocentrists are forced to agree that the population of Eurasia has evolved more than Africans. Modern genetics confirms that Africans are most closely related to today's great apes. This means that even if people originally came to Eurasia from Africa, then the current Africans, whose ancestors did not leave Africa, had to go a shorter evolutionary path from an ape-like ancestor than Africans who left Africa. This in itself puts egalitarianism in serious doubt - everyone cannot be genetically the same when some are more ape-like than others.

And as a real professional scientist, completely independent of the political situation, Ferlet rightly states: “Summing up, let's say that the theory of the “Exodus from Africa” is defeated on all fronts; it testifies only to the power of egalitarianism to distort science.”

Egalitarianism, that is, the ideology of equality of all at the biological level through miscegenation, inevitably leads to heat death according to the laws of thermodynamics, and these physical patterns are easily found in world history at the level of development of individual states, empires and even large civilizational associations. It was racial chaos that destroyed ancient Egypt, Babylon, Greece and Rome. We can easily observe the same depressing processes today: “Life, like other acts of creation, is a local decrease in entropy (structural disorder), metization, like death, destruction and chaos, increases entropy.”

All social conflicts in the form of revolutions, spontaneous riots and just domestic violence, according to Ferlet, they basically have the opposition of nature against the chaos of confusion, incited by the priests of egalitarianism. In addition, miscegenation inevitably causes a decrease in the IQ of the citizens of the state and leads to a general decline in culture, which today is observed almost everywhere in large metropolitan areas. Biological immunity is also reduced, which in turn leads to a general weakening of the constitution and degeneration. "In race mixing there is no plan to create a fitter person, or even a healthier, more intelligent, or any other desirable quality."

Therefore, the author of the book rightly concludes that the doctrine of egalitarianism is a form of mental pathology, and only a reasonable program of eugenics can save the world from chaos, degradation and degeneration. “Egalitarianism is an ideology at war with biology, and the creatures of Nature cannot survive for long following a suicidal ideology. Nature calls man to fight and defeat his rivals. Egalitarianism calls on a person, at least a white one, to welcome his rivals and contribute to their triumph over him.

Mixing, according to the scientist, inevitably leads to the erosion of the system of moral values, therefore, racially mixed societies are destroyed not only biologically, but also ethically, since the zealots of equality are accustomed to consider themselves as arbiters of morality. “The claim to moral superiority, however, is inconsistent with the multiculturalist thesis of “the equality of all cultures,” and since culture includes morality, if one's morals are higher, others must be lower. Indeed, even multiculturalists consider some cultural practices alien to us to be immoral.”

At the end of his essay, Richard Ferle calls on readers, based on all of the above, to soberly assess the whole drama of the situation for white people and make an informed choice in the interests of their own future. In this matter, the author adheres to the main line clearly marked in such philosophical books as Oswald Spengler's The Decline of Europe, Madison Grant's The Decline of the Great Race, Patrick Buchanan's The Death of the West, and many others. In his opinion, no one but the whites themselves is to blame for their extinction today, and no one but the whites can save them from historical disappearance.

Of particular value to this book is the fact that in most of the works we have mentioned, the contours of the coming catastrophe of the “white world” were substantiated at the philosophical and speculative level, and our contemporary Richard Ferle relies on the facts of population genetics, forensic science and the existing legal practice, which undoubtedly increases the value of the author's judgments. His book is no longer an emotionally apocalyptic warning, but a medical diagnosis of a patient with a clear prescription for surgical intervention in order to save his life.

The modern Russian reader, after reading this landmark book, will undoubtedly receive rich food for thought, because with the fall iron curtain and the end of an era cold war It is becoming increasingly clear that the fates of white people in both the western and eastern hemispheres are inseparable and interrelated.

It was the altruism of the white people who enthusiastically began to recklessly scatter the seeds of their civilization in all parts of the Earth in the era of the Great geographical discoveries, played a cruel joke with them, because no one asked them for such royal cultural gifts. A seemingly contradictory but extremely metaphysical Russian proverb “If you don’t want evil, don’t do good to people” in a racial context current situation takes on a very clear meaning. White people themselves called trouble on their future by the inappropriate sacrificial squandering of hereditary talents. “Ultimately, the most valuable thing that white people have is their genome. They can lose territory and wealth, but, having kept their genome intact, they will be able to survive and regain everything they have lost, ”proclaims the American scientist Richard Ferle, like an oracle of a new era of genetic determinism.

Translation from English: Cand. biol. Sciences D.O. Rumyantsev (Parts I, III–V), Ph.D. psychol. Sciences I.V. Zhuravlev (Part II)

Richard D. Ferle

Erectus roams between us. Conquest of the white race

Erectus Walks Amongst Us. The evolution of modern humans" by Richard D. Fuerle

Vladimir Avdeev The Conspiracy Anthropology of Richard Ferlet

"Anthropology is one of those rare sciences that only a few professors can privatize."

Fritz Lenz, German racial theorist

"If my theory does not agree with the facts, then so much the worse for the facts." G.W.F. Hegel

Among such restless and "uncomfortable" truth-seekers is the modern American scientist Richard Ferle, Richard Fuerle, the author of the book Erectus wanders between us, which has made a splash in the West. This fundamental work on almost the entire set of modern data affecting the problem of the evolution of man and his races fully reflects the severity of discussions in the scientific community, as well as the degree of interest of biased circles of politicians, jurists and representatives of the mass media.

Richard Ferlet is a classic example of a "free thinker". And if in modern Russian

understanding, this definition has rather a negative meaning, implying dilettantism and “omniscience” of an amateur philosopher, the situation is completely different in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, where a free thinker is, first of all, a high-level professional who personally bears the burden of economic and social responsibility for the fruits of his intellectual activity. This is a man of mental labor, he pays for everything according to the bills, reports only to his conscience, the canons of science and is not subject to the whiffs of the political situation.

Richard Ferle does not live in an “ivory tower”, but on a small island near New York, surrounded by pristine nature, and, despite his mature age, calls himself an eternal student, as he combines a relentless craving for self-improvement with studying at prestigious educational institutions . He holds a bachelor's degree in mathematics, physics, chemistry, a master's degree in economics, and a doctorate in law. It is this wide range of knowledge that allowed Ferlet to work as a patent examiner for a long time, and, like no one else, he knows how insidious and sometimes illusory the boundary separating science and jurisprudence, without which the functioning of modern society today is simply unthinkable. Over the long years of his career, having seen enough of the intrigues and machinations that are happening at this “border crossing”, as befits a true free thinker, he decided to independently analyze the key problem of the evolution of mankind and its races, clearly showing that there is a place for smuggling in science. Thus was born his book, which has already been reprinted several times.

However, the talents of Richard Ferle are not limited to this, for he is an amateur composer, as well as the author of monographs on the Austrian economy, natural law and the theory of anarchism.

Thus, the increase in the concentration of racial traits and, as a consequence of the evolutionary isolation of races, is a natural path for the organic development of nature. Biological differences are the main driver in the struggle for the survival of species - this is the root of Darwin's theory. “In other words, genetic equality, egalitarianism makes evolution impossible. And without the ability to evolve, biological species can only die out with changes in the habitat that inevitably occur.

The ecological niche in which a race develops inevitably shapes its specialization. On the basis of data from archeology, cultural history, genetics and the theory of behavior, Ferlet illustrates the correctness of his arguments, which confirm the general theory of evolution. Natural selection created traits and fixed them hereditarily, which contributed to the development of races.

These natural scientific conclusions lead to the fact that the theory of the origin of a modern type of man from Africa is untenable and openly politically biased,

since "the genetic differences between Africans and Europeans are so pronounced that the proportion of European admixture in Africans can be determined at an error level of only 0.02."

Ferlet considers and systematizes in great detail the main differences between races at the morphological and then genetic level, clearly demonstrating the degree of remoteness of the main racial trunks from each other and the level of specialization of representatives of modern races. The morphological development of the brain is directly related to the IQ, which, in turn, determines the specifics of human behavior and its civilizational abilities. Altruistic tendencies, criminal tendencies, and sexual behavior patterns are also functional outcomes of brain development. The specificity of sexual-marital relations clearly indicates where it is necessary to look for the centers of the emergence of races. “Pairing was an important step towards humanization, and since it is less characteristic of Africans, this trait did not originate in Africa, and the population that embarked on the path of humanization was not African. If we talk about the donation of money, blood or human organs, then Europeans are much more generous than representatives of other races, and they show this generosity regardless of whether the person in need is their relative or not. Therefore, these fatal racial-evolutionary differences cannot be eliminated with the help of social philanthropy. “Trillions of dollars are being spent on programs aimed at closing the gap in academic achievement between whites and blacks. All these programs have failed. Geneticists identify the genes responsible for intelligence and estimate the prevalence of these genes around the world. Not surprisingly, the prevalence of such genes in Africa is much lower than in Europe or Asia. It is hard to argue that blacks are incapable of achievement because of poor education or because of racist attitudes on the part of whites if they do not have the genes necessary for learning.

With the help of these facts, taken from the classic works of evolutionary anthropology, the author brings readers to the main thesis of his book: the modern politically tolerant concept

The origin of all human races from Africa does not stand up to criticism, because it is intensively implanted in the public consciousness by purely political methods, being in clear contradiction with the principles of objective science.

And here begins, in our opinion, the most interesting thing, which today has led to such a massive popularity of the American scientist, since Richard Ferlet can be presented as one of the heralds of a whole trend that would be appropriate to call conspiracy anthropology. For in no other way than with the help of conspiracy theory, it is impossible to explain the persistence of liberal circles, with which they are pushing the concept of the African origin of mankind to the surface of public consciousness with all their might. It should be emphasized that the very term "conspiracy anthropology" was first introduced into use by the author of these lines, although the very tendency of political falsification of the history of mankind can be traced back to medieval church hierarchs. These facts of falsification are widely publicized, but attempts to appropriate the genealogical tree of mankind continue to this day, so it is extremely important to consider the methodology of modern encroachments on freedom of discussion, which is the basic principle of the existence of science. And although the days of the fires of the Inquisition have passed, the methods of modern tradition of ostracizing the authority of a scientist are still very effective. In this regard, Richard Ferlet's Erectus Walks Between Us is a very valuable tool for maintaining an atmosphere of sanity in modern society, being a kind of guide to the labyrinths of modern conspiracy anthropology. And the invaluable experience of an American scientist will serve

V this issue is a kind of thread of Ariadne.

Criticizing the aforementioned fashionable hypothesis, the author rightly asks the following questions: “If

modern man existed in Africa 160,000 years ago, why are today's Africans so primitive in all respects? Haven't Africans reverse-evolved from more advanced ancestors, becoming more primitive? Another question that springs to mind is why did tropical-adapted Africans leave Africa 65,000 years ago, just in the middle of the first ice age (which lasted roughly 73,000 to 55,000 years ago), when more of the cold-adapted hominids of Eurasia were moving south? And the last question: why did African erectus become sapiens, and not Asian or European ones, especially in light of the fact that the habitat in Eurasia was more selective for modern traits, and turning into Homo sapiens would give a greater advantage?

Such questions arise in any unbiased researcher by themselves.

Even worse, from the point of view of elementary logic, things are with this theory when we begin to analyze its chronological aspects in geographical space. “How is it possible that allegedly modern Africans could not even reach the islands off the African coast just a few thousand years ago? That the islands, even visible from Africa, have not been explored and inhabited certainly suggests that Africans were not yet developed even very recently, so it is simply ridiculous to believe that they were developed when they allegedly migrated from Africa 65,000 years back. How could modern Africans supposedly not only leave Africa and make their way through Europe and Asia, but even get to Australia and the Pacific islands, without ever reaching the islands very close to their coast? - the American scientist rightly asks.

As is known, the breeding of domestic animals and the selective cultivation of valuable varieties of plants are indispensable attributes of any phase of the development of human society. Exactly the same

traces of vital activity at the sites of mass migrations, scattered over the surface of the Earth, should clearly indicate the direction of movement of masses of people. But in the most striking way, it turns out that nothing of the kind has been found in Africa - the supposed cradle of mankind. One gets the impression that the progenitors of modern races simultaneously scattered over all even the most remote regions of the land from one place, leaving no traces of their temporary stay anywhere, and in the process of this magical levitation, they changed the whole complex of racial characteristics, consisting of thousands of parameters, at once and in a very diverse way, after This created completely different and dissimilar types of civilization.

"Mitochondrial Eve" is a metaphysical name given by the Afrocentrists to our "mother", who they believe lived in Africa about 150,000 years ago, from whom all living people got their mitochondrial DNA. “This 'Eva' was not the only woman, since a viable population would have to include at least a thousand married couples. According to Afrocentric ideas, all women in this population either had the same mitochondrial DNA, or, having a different mitochondrial DNA, did not have daughters.

It seems that this is already reminiscent of the tricks of card sharpers with the substitution of cards within the same suit, when a jack suddenly turns out of a six. But the wonders of the amusing "concept" do not end there, for in the framework of the modern tradition, Afrocentrists argue that the human genealogical tree, built on a computer, clearly points to the African ancestral home. And since this is calculated on a computer, then this is the ultimate truth. But Richard Ferle, himself a certified mathematician, shows that this family tree can just as well be derived from the Martians, since a computer is just a technical device that performs someone else's will according to a given program, nothing more. And it is not his fault that the will of the Afrocentrists opposes all the laws of mathematical logic. “The family tree of the Exodus from Africa theory is not a simple tree. In fact, there are over a billion such evolutionary trees. For these reasons, until technical problems are overcome, mitochondrial DNA will not be able to answer questions about either Eve's habitat or her age. If computer-generated genealogies by Afrocentrists don't prove that Eve lived in Africa, and don't even provide a reliable answer to the question of when she lived, is it possible to use mitochondrial DNA data in some other way to find out where she lived?

Differences in the genetic structure most directly affect the intelligence of populations and the specifics of their evolutionary struggle for existence. “It would take much more than 65,000 years to replace the population of Eurasia with people from Africa. Assuming they have characteristics that Africans had 65,000 years ago, it is highly implausible that they had preeminence in foraging on continents with which they were unfamiliar, even if the inhabitants of Eurasia were more primitive. In addition, it is very unlikely that the Eurasians welcomed the Africans with open arms on their territory, thus a gradual peaceful replacement was not possible.

All social conflicts in the form of revolutions, spontaneous riots and just domestic violence, according to Ferlet, are basically the opposition of nature against the chaos of confusion, incited by the priests of egalitarianism. In addition, miscegenation inevitably causes a decrease in the IQ of the citizens of the state and leads to a general decline in culture, which today is observed almost everywhere in large metropolitan areas. Biological immunity is also reduced, which in turn leads to a general weakening of the constitution and degeneration. "In race mixing there is no plan to create a fitter person, or even a healthier, more intelligent, or any other desirable quality."

degradation and degeneration. “Egalitarianism is an ideology at war with biology, and the creatures of Nature cannot survive for long following a suicidal ideology. Nature calls man to fight and defeat his rivals. Egalitarianism calls on a person, at least a white one, to welcome his rivals and contribute to their triumph over him.

Of particular value to this book is the fact that in most of the writings we have mentioned, the contours of the coming catastrophe of the “white world” were substantiated at the philosophical and speculative level, and our contemporary Richard Ferle relies on the facts of population genetics, forensic science and existing legal practice, which undoubtedly increases the value of the author's judgments. His book is no longer an emotionally apocalyptic warning, but a medical diagnosis of a patient with a clear prescription for surgical intervention in order to save his life.

The modern Russian reader, after reading this landmark book, will undoubtedly receive rich food for thought, because with the fall of the Iron Curtain and the end of the Cold War era, it becomes more and more obvious that the destinies of white people in both the Western and Eastern hemispheres are inseparable and interconnected.

It was the altruism of white people, who enthusiastically began to recklessly scatter the seeds of their civilization over all parts of the Earth during the Age of Discovery, played a cruel joke on them, because no one asked them for such royal cultural gifts. Contradictory at first glance, but extremely metaphysical Russian proverb “If you don’t want evil, don’t do good to people”, in the racial context of the current situation, it acquires a completely clear meaning. White people themselves called trouble on their future by the inappropriate sacrificial squandering of hereditary talents. “Ultimately, the most valuable thing that white people have is their genome. They can lose territory and wealth, but, having kept their genome intact, they will be able to survive and regain everything they have lost, ”proclaims the American scientist Richard Ferle, like an oracle of a new era of genetic determinism.

Translation from English: Cand. biol. Sciences D.O. Rumyantsev (Parts I, III–V), Ph.D. psychol. Sciences I.V. Zhuravlev (Part II)

Foreword

"If you resolve a dispute without listening to all parties, you will be wrong at least half the time."

centuries ago, our ancestors did not find anything terrible in the possession of other people and in their sale, and a few millennia before that, a representative of a neighboring tribe could be the main dish for dinner. Had we lived then, there is little doubt that we would not have objected. A few hundred years after us, a future generation will probably view our values as ignorant and barbaric as we view the values of our predecessors.

I mention this to encourage the reader to discard, or at least rein in, the opinions, attitudes, and beliefs he has acquired throughout his life, as many of them will be challenged in this book. Let's go beyond our time as if we had just arrived on this planet and weigh all the evidence and arguments presented. It is almost impossible to reach the truth by listening to only one side, you have to hear the other.

Much of what people are now being told in school and through the media is not true. There are knowledgeable people who know that this is so, but they dare not say anything. The rest live in this sea of disinformation. Since almost everyone considers misinformation to be prevalent, let's assume that this must be true. Therefore, acting on the basis of disinformation, we accept important life decisions too often detrimental.

Today, in my declining years, I see no greater gift to give to the next generation than to challenge at least some of these, I believe, false beliefs. To encourage distribution of this book, it is being published royalty-free and may be copied with attribution without liability to the author. I hope to make the book available for free download on the Internet, as I have done with my other books.

Very little held me back from writing this book. Efforts have been made to sidestep inconsequential but shocking facts, especially those that some would find offensive. Such facts are presented openly where they cannot be omitted. I tried to be as correct as possible, although I would be surprised by the absence of errors, since the areas involved are very wide and assumptions were required to fill in the gaps in the proofs. Whenever possible, I avoided professional language and gave explanations of the terms used. The book could include a large number of additional materials, but after about four years of doing almost exclusively this work, I decided that it was time to complete the work.

Thanks

Many have made suggestions and provided the information included in this book. Dr. Willard W. Ohlson is to be commended for his insightful observations and original ideas in the field of human evolution. His vast knowledge of biology, especially concerning fossil skulls, was extremely helpful, and I greatly appreciate his direct and honest conclusions.

A large number of members of the "e-1" and "ADlist" Internet communities at Yahoo also made insightful remarks and brought information to my attention.

The book originates from the messages of a self-taught, former Marine Ronald A. Fonda, who has repeatedly explained in these two Yahoo communities why he believes the "Out of Africa" theory of human origins is wrong. Although he maintains a website on the subject, which hosts papers supporting his position (www.rafonda.com), I believe they are presented in a predominantly professional language that is difficult for the layman to understand. Convinced that he had achieved something, I suggested to him and others who agreed with him that they write a book that would make his ideas clear. common man. When I realized a few months later that no one was going to start writing this book, I offered my services as its editor. It seemed to me that I should make what was written easy to understand and not leave gaps that could undermine the arguments. But still no one gives me anything to edit

provided, so I started researching and writing myself, first as an "editor" and then writing almost everything as Ron's collaborator.

Ron and I have already gone out of our way to prove that modern man originated not in Africa, but only in Eurasia. This contradicts both scientific theories: both the Exodus from Africa theory and the Multiregional Hypothesis. As the book progressed, Ron, somewhat reluctantly, and I agreed that there were sufficient grounds for believing that the evolution of man from a primitive mammal did not occur anywhere in Africa and that the human lineage is closer to the Asian orangutan than to the African chimpanzee. . But that was the limit of Ron's speculation.

By the time of the serious discussion of Chapter 24, I had become convinced that biology is no different from physics in that it is also limited by laws or rules. Data from genetics and archeology give an age of origin for races of about 65,000 years, but these rules imply that races originated over 2 million years ago. Since Ron and I could not agree on how to resolve these and other differences, we parted amicably.

This book contains material that I find extremely exciting, especially as it is unlikely to be easily found elsewhere, particularly in one book. To bring everything together, it was necessary to conduct research in various fields (for example, in genetics, physical anthropology, sociology, paleontology, psychology), digging up controversial and contradictory information, partly erroneous and even fraudulent. Realizing the enormity of this task, I was repeatedly tempted to give it up. Luckily, Ron had already acquired a good knowledge of these areas, carefully thought through the implications of the information he gathered, and was able to keep me on track.

Ronald Fonda is thus to be commended not only for the impetus for this book, but for the many ideas scattered throughout it. Part III is based almost entirely on his website www.rafonda.com, and he is also responsible for many of the ideas in Part IV.

I am not overlooking the fact that the theory of human origins offered in this book is contradicted by the vast literature in support of the Exodus from Africa theory. However, there are good reasons to believe that this theory is wrong and that modern man did not evolve in Africa. I hope that the reader will impartially consider the case brought to his trial, while I eagerly sit in the dock, awaiting the verdict.

As always, I take all errors and erroneous statements personally. Comments and corrections without swear words can be emailed to me at: [email protected]

Introduction

“We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the true tragedy of life is when an adult is afraid of the light.”

When man acquired a brain capable of abstract thought, one of his first questions must have been, "Where did we come from?" The answer was to endow oneself with a glorious lineage - from the gods, from Mother Earth herself, from mythical monsters or from giant animals.

But modern science suggests a more mundane origin - man descended from apes, a member of the same family as modern chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans. Millions of years later, the descendants of this

apes have evolved enough of their ape-like ancestors to become a separate genus Homo, man. Many years and many species of Homo passed before the appearance of the first intelligent person, a somewhat primitive looking Homo sapiens, and even later, a very man of sense, Homo sapiens sapiens, modern man. (Gives himself the most laudatory names.)

In paleoanthropology, the science that studies extinct human ancestors, much is controversial, and as we move back in time, the origin of man becomes less and less certain. Despite this, I decided to take the risk of error and make some plausible assumptions about the early stage of the evolutionary path of man from his beginning as a primitive mammal to the time when he began to walk on two legs. However, the book focuses primarily on the question of how man evolved from a bipedal great ape to his present state.

Ask most paleoanthropologists where man originated, and they, like Charles Darwin, will answer with one word - "Africa" - Africa, from the very beginning and on every subsequent stage of the journey, except for the last, when races formed. They will say that the natives tropical Africa were the first people of the modern type, and the Mongoloids and Caucasians evolved from these Africans. Not everyone will agree with this answer, and this book presents an alternative scenario.

The non-specialist may decide that the question of the origin of modern man will be studied in the same way as other scientific questions, or at least assume that the study will consist in dispassionately examining the data and drawing the following conclusions from them. Unfortunately, when a person studies himself, he is not an unbiased observer. Anthropologists are not Martians, they are people and, like everyone else, have their own ideological and psychological leaps.

One might expect that, like some of the first people to question where they came from, paleoanthropologists would choose a glorious past for their people and a less dignified one for others, but this is not the case. Just as tennis etiquette dictates that the winner should not brag about his victory, but kindly tell the loser that he played well and was a dangerous opponent, even though this was not true, most paleoanthropologists try not to focus on the differences between different populations, thereby downplaying the strengths of their people and exaggerating the strengths of others.

Why are they doing that - interest Ask, since self-pride is certainly more natural than self-denigration, but nevertheless there are good reasons for doing so, and anthropologists are not alone in behaving in this way. This is currently the only acceptable behavior in all western (white) societies including the US, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. And while the winner of a tennis match who tells his losing partner, "You're a bad tennis player" only suffers disapproving looks for violating etiquette, remarking that an ethnic group is undesirable can result in a fine and jail time, especially if it's true.

Egalitarianism, the dominant ideology of our time, believes that all people are universally equal, at least genetically, and any suggestion to the contrary is simply unacceptable. I will refer to those who do not allow any questions regarding genetic equality to be asked the "Equality Police". On most campuses, the Equality Police enforce "speech code" (i.e., rules that stifle free speech) and (mandatory) "lessons of tolerance" (i.e., brainwashing). Those who are "unreceptive" (i.e., think in their own way) may end up being disciplined, expelled, or worse. Research that could reveal racial differences, especially in intelligence and behavior, is strictly prohibited, which created difficulties in

The book of the American scientist R. Furle "Erectus wanders between us" is devoted to a discussion of the most controversial and complex issues of modern evolutionary anthropology. Acting as a critic of the position of egalitarianism, R. Förle systematizes and cites in his book numerous scientific data on genetic, anatomical, physiological, psychological, behavioral, and cultural differences between the main races. Being a staunch opponent of the theory of the origin of man from Africa, the author, based on the data he cites from various scientific fields(including physical anthropology, population genetics, psychology, medicine, sociology, criminology), develops the concept of the origin of modern man from Eurasia.

Richard Ferlet is a classic example of a "free thinker". And if in the modern Russian understanding this definition has rather a negative meaning, implying dilettantism and "knowing" of an amateur philosopher, then the situation is completely different in the Anglo-Saxon tradition, where a free thinker is primarily a high-level professional who personally bears the burden of economic and social responsibility for fruits of their intellectual activity. This is a man of mental labor, he pays for everything according to the bills, reports only to his conscience, the canons of science and is not subject to the whiffs of the political situation.

Richard Ferle does not live in an “ivory tower”, but on a small island near New York, surrounded by pristine nature, and, despite his mature age, calls himself an eternal student, as he combines a relentless craving for self-improvement with studying at prestigious educational institutions . He holds a bachelor's degree in mathematics, physics, chemistry, a master's degree in economics, and a doctorate in law. It is this wide range of knowledge that allowed Ferlet to work as a patent examiner for a long time, and, like no one else, he knows how insidious and sometimes illusory the boundary separating science and jurisprudence, without which the functioning of modern society today is simply unthinkable. Over the long years of his career, having seen enough of the intrigues and machinations that are happening at this “border crossing”, as befits a true free thinker, he decided to independently analyze the key problem of the evolution of mankind and its races, clearly showing that there is a place for smuggling in science. Thus was born his book, which has already been reprinted several times.

However, Richard Ferle's talents are not limited to this, for he is an amateur composer, as well as the author of monographs on the Austrian economy, natural law and the theory of anarchism.

Foreword

Each person is a product of his time. We are all sure that our values and aspirations are moral, but this cannot be true, since every generation believes in this, nevertheless, different generations have extremely conflicting values. Just a few centuries ago, our ancestors did not find anything terrible in owning and selling other people, and a few millennia before that, a representative of a neighboring tribe could be the main dish for dinner. Had we lived then, there is little doubt that we would not have objected. A few hundred years after us, a future generation will probably view our values as ignorant and barbaric as we view the values of our predecessors.

Much of what people are now being told in school and through the media is not true. There are knowledgeable people who know that this is so, but they dare not say anything. The rest live in this sea of disinformation. Since almost everyone considers misinformation to be prevalent, let's assume that this must be true. Therefore, acting on the basis of disinformation, we make important life decisions that all too often turn out to be detrimental.

Very little held me back from writing this book. Efforts have been made to sidestep inconsequential but shocking facts, especially those that some would find offensive. Such facts are presented openly where they cannot be omitted. I tried to be as correct as possible, although I would be surprised by the absence of errors, since the areas involved are very wide and assumptions were required to fill in the gaps in the proofs. Whenever possible, I avoided professional language and gave explanations of the terms used. The book could have included a lot of additional material, but after about four years of almost exclusively this work, I decided it was time to complete the work.

Richard Ferle is a classic example of a “free thinker”, a restless and “uncomfortable” truth-seeker, the author of the book “Erectus wanders between us”, which made a sensation in the West. This fundamental work on almost the entire set of modern data affecting the problem of the evolution of man and his races fully reflects the severity of discussions in the scientific community, as well as the degree of interest of biased circles of politicians, jurists and representatives of the mass media.